Who wrote the Bible? Objective opinion. Who and when wrote the Bible

– Often, we Orthodox are reproached for not reading the Bible as often as, for example, Protestants do. To what extent are such accusations justified?

- The Orthodox Church recognizes two sources of knowledge of God - Holy Scripture and Holy Tradition. And the first is an integral part of the second. After all, initially the sermons of the holy apostles were delivered and transmitted orally. Holy Tradition includes not only Holy Scripture, but also liturgical texts, decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, iconography, and a number of other sources that occupy an important place in the life of the Church. And everything that is said in Holy Scripture is also in the Tradition of the Church.

Since ancient times, the life of a Christian has been inextricably linked with biblical texts. But in the 16th century, when the so-called “Reformation” arose, the situation changed. The Protestants abandoned the Holy Tradition of the Church and limited themselves to the study of the Holy Scriptures. And therefore, a special kind of piety appeared among them - reading and studying biblical texts. I want to emphasize once again: from the point of view of the Orthodox Church, Holy Tradition includes the entire volume of church life, including Holy Scripture. Moreover, even if someone does not read the Word of God, but regularly visits the temple, he hears that the entire worship service is permeated with biblical quotations. Thus, if a person lives the church life, then he is in the atmosphere of the Bible.

How many books are included in Holy Scripture? What is the difference between the Orthodox Bible and the Protestant Bible?

- Holy Scripture is a collection of books, different books and by the time of their writing, and by authorship, and by content, and by style. They are divided into two parts: the Old Testament and the New Testament. The Orthodox Bible has 77 books, while the Protestant Bible has 66.

- What is the reason for this discrepancy?

- The fact is that in the Orthodox Bible, more precisely in the Holy Scriptures of the Old Testament, in addition to 39 canonical books, there are 11 more non-canonical ones: Tobit, Judith, Wisdom of Solomon, Wisdom of Jesus, the son of Sirach, the Epistle of Jeremiah, Baruch, the second and third books of Ezra, three Maccabees. In the "Large Christian Catechism" of St. Philaret of Moscow, it is said that the division of books into canonical and non-canonical is caused by the absence of the latter (11 books) in the Jewish primary sources and their presence only in the Greek ones, that is, in the Septuagint (translation of 70 interpreters). In turn, the Protestants, starting with M. Luther, abandoned non-canonical books, erroneously assigning them the status of "apocryphal". As for the 27 books of the New Testament, they are recognized by both Orthodox and Protestants. We are talking about the Christian part of the Bible, written after the birth of Christ: the New Testament books testify to the earthly life of the Lord Jesus Christ and the first decades of the existence of the Church. These include the four Gospels, the book of the Acts of the Apostles, the epistles of the apostles (seven of the catholic and 14 of the apostle Paul), as well as the Revelation of John the Theologian (Apocalypse).

How to study the Bible correctly? Is it worth starting knowledge from the first pages of Genesis?

— The main thing is to have a sincere desire to learn the Word of God. It is better to start with the New Testament. Experienced shepherds recommend getting acquainted with the Bible through the Gospel of Mark (that is, not in the order in which they are presented). It is the shortest, written in simple and accessible language. After reading the Gospels of Matthew, Luke and John, we move on to the book of Acts, the apostolic letters and the Apocalypse (the most complex and most mysterious book in the entire Bible). And only after that you can proceed to the Old Testament books. Only after reading the New Testament, it is easier to understand the meaning of the Old. After all, the Apostle Paul did not say in vain that the Old Testament legislation was a schoolmaster to Christ (see: Gal. 3: 24): it leads a person, as if a child by the hand, to let him understand for real what happened during the Incarnation, what is the incarnation of God in principle for a person ...

— And if the reader does not understand some episodes of the Bible? What to do in this case? Who to contact?

- It is advisable to have books on hand that explain the Holy Scriptures. We can recommend the creations of the blessed Theophylact of Bulgaria. His explanations are short, but very accessible and deeply ecclesiastical, reflecting the Tradition of the Church. The conversations of St. John Chrysostom on the Gospels and the Apostolic Epistles are also classic. If you have any questions, it would be nice to consult with an experienced priest. It must be understood that reading the Holy Scriptures is part of a spiritual achievement. And it is very important to pray, to purify your soul. After all, even in the Old Testament it was said: wisdom will not enter into an evil soul and will not dwell in a body enslaved to sin, for the Holy Spirit of wisdom will move away from wickedness and evade foolish thinking, and will be ashamed of the approaching unrighteousness (Wisdom 1: 4-5) .

“So, it is necessary to prepare for the reading of the Holy Scripture in a special way?”

– Experienced elders in monasteries gave the novice a rule: before studying the Holy Scriptures, you first need to familiarize yourself with the works of the holy fathers. Bible reading is not just the study of the Word of God, it is like prayer. In general, I would recommend reading the Bible in the morning, after the prayer rule. I think it's easy to set aside 15-20 minutes to read one or two chapters from the Gospel, the apostolic epistles. So you can get a spiritual charge for the whole day. Very often, in this way, answers appear to serious questions that life poses to a person.

- Sometimes there is such a situation: I read it, understood what it was about, but it doesn’t suit you, because you don’t agree with what is written ...

- According to Tertullian (one of the church writers of antiquity), our soul is a Christian by nature. Thus, biblical truths are given to man from the very beginning, they are embedded in his nature, his consciousness. We sometimes call it conscience, that is, it is not something new that is not characteristic of human nature. The main postulates of the Holy Scriptures are the voice of God that resounds in the nature of each of us. Therefore, first of all, you need to pay attention to your life: does everything in it agree with the commandments of God? If a person does not want to listen to the voice of God, what other voice does he need? Who will he listen to?

- Once they asked St. Philaret: they say, how can you believe that the prophet Jonah was swallowed by a whale, which has a very narrow throat? In response, he said: “If it had been written in the Holy Scriptures that it was not a whale that swallowed Jonah, but Jonah swallowed a whale, I would have believed it.” Of course, today such statements can be perceived with sarcasm. In this regard, the question arises: why does the Church trust the Holy Scriptures so much? After all, the Bible books are written by people...

— The main difference between the Bible and other books is the revelation of God. This is not just the work of some outstanding person. Through the prophets and apostles, the voice of God Himself is reproduced in an accessible language. If the Creator addresses us, how should we treat this? Hence such attention and such trust in the Holy Scriptures.

What language were the Bible books written in? How did their translation affect the modern perception of sacred texts?

Most of the Old Testament books are written in Hebrew (Hebrew). Some of them have survived only in Aramaic. The already mentioned non-canonical books have come down to us exclusively in Greek: for example, Judith, Tobit, Baruch and Maccabees. The third book of Ezra in its entirety is known to us only in Latin. As for the New Testament, it was mostly written in Greek, the Koine dialect. Some biblical scholars believe that the Gospel of Matthew was written in Hebrew, but no primary sources have come down to us (there are only translations). Of course, it would be better to read and study biblical books, relying on primary sources, originals. But this has been the case since ancient times: all the books of the Holy Scriptures were translated. And therefore, for the most part, people are familiar with the Holy Scriptures translated into their native language.

- It would be interesting to know: what language did Jesus Christ speak?

- Many believe that Christ used the Aramaic language. However, when talking about the original Gospel of Matthew, most biblical scholars point to Hebrew as the language of the Old Testament books. The debate on this topic continues to this day.

— According to Bible Societies, back in 2008 the Bible was fully or partially translated into 2,500 languages. Some scientists believe that there are 3 thousand languages ​​in the world, others point to 6 thousand. It is very difficult to define the criterion: what is a language and what is a dialect. But we can say with absolute certainty that all people living in different parts of the globe can read the Bible in whole or in part in their own language.

- Which language is preferable for us: Russian, Ukrainian or Church Slavonic?

- The main criterion - the Bible must be understandable. Traditionally, Church Slavonic is used for worship in the Church. Unfortunately, it is not taught in public schools. Therefore, many biblical expressions require clarification. By the way, this applies not only to our era. This problem also arose in the 19th century. At the same time, a translation of the Holy Scripture into Russian appeared - the Synodal Translation of the Bible. He passed the test of time, had a huge impact on the formation of the Russian language in particular and Russian culture in general. Therefore, for Russian-speaking parishioners, I would recommend using it for home reading. As for the Ukrainian-speaking parishioners, the situation here is a bit more complicated. The fact is that the attempt of the first complete translation of the Bible into Ukrainian was made by Panteleimon Kulish in the 60s of the 19th century. Ivan Nechuy-Levitsky joined him. The translation was completed by Ivan Pulyuy (already after Kulish's death). Their work was published in 1903 by the Bible Society. In the XX century. the translations of Ivan Ogienko and Ivan Khomenko became the most authoritative. Many people are now trying to translate all or part of the Bible. There are both positive experiences and difficult, controversial moments. So, it would probably be incorrect to recommend any specific text of the Ukrainian translation. Now the Ukrainian Orthodox Church is translating the Four Gospels. I hope that this will be a successful translation both for home reading and for liturgical reading (in those parishes where Ukrainian is used).

- In some parishes, during the divine service, a biblical passage is read in their native language (after reading in Church Slavonic) ...

— This tradition is typical not only for our parishes, but also for many foreign parishes, where there are believers from different countries. In such situations, liturgical passages from Holy Scripture are repeated in their native languages. After all, spiritual food should be given to a person in the form in which it can bring spiritual benefits.

— From time to time, information appears in the media about some new Bible book, which was supposedly previously lost or kept secret. It necessarily reveals some "sacred" moments that contradict Christianity. How to treat such sources?

- In the last two centuries, many ancient manuscripts (manuscripts) have been discovered, which made it possible to coordinate our view of the study of the biblical text. First of all, this concerns the Qumran manuscripts found in the Dead Sea region (in the Qumran caves). Many manuscripts have been found there, both Biblical and Gnostic (that is, texts that distort Christian teaching). It is possible that in the future many Gnostic manuscripts will be found. It should be recalled that even during the 2nd and 3rd centuries. The church fought against the heresy of Gnosticism. And in our time, when we are witnessing a craze for the occult, these texts appear under the guise of some kind of sensation.

- By what criteria can one determine a positive result from regular reading of the Holy Scriptures? By the number of memorized quotes?

— We read the Word of God not for memorization. Although there are situations, for example in seminaries, when such a task is set. Biblical texts are important for the spiritual life, to feel the breath of God Himself. Thus, we partake of those grace-filled gifts that are in the Church, learn about the commandments, thanks to which we become better, we draw closer to the Lord. Therefore, the study of the Bible is the most important part of our spiritual ascent, spiritual life. With regular reading, many passages are gradually memorized and without special memorization.

Traditional delusions

The Bible is a sacred book for a significant part of the world's population, and many of them blindly believe that it was written by the Lord himself, or at least from his words. Enough evidence can be found for this, especially for real historical events, one way or another veiled by sacred texts. This ancient book is just a storehouse of wisdom, with which it is not even possible to enter into an argument.

But all this is only at first glance. After all, if you approach this issue from the other side, it becomes clear who actually wrote the Bible, and also why he needed it. Let's try to figure this out.

Who wrote the Bible. The opinion of theologians

Who, if not individuals, "particularly close to the Lord", will be able to fully answer such a delicate question that worries the minds of some part of the parishioners? True, how truthful their answers will be, to be judged only by those who will hear them. So, according to pundits, the Bible itself, the New Testament and the Old Testament were written by the prophets, based on the received visions sent to them from above (read - by the Lord). Moreover, it is not possible to find the names of these prophets, except for John the Theologian ("Apocalypse"). You can, of course, believe this, or you can turn to another delicate question about how to call a person who believes that in a dream he talks with the Lord, and the rest of the time he broadcasts the received truth to the people.

Who wrote the Bible. The opinion of the mystics

Mystics are capable of endowing any, even the most insignificant thing, with supernatural abilities and hidden meaning. Such "costs of the profession." But their opinion, oddly enough, is more like the truth. They believe that the Bible is a kind of collection of the age-old wisdom of peoples, covered with a veil of everyday life, so that only those who are imbued with Divine light could find it. We will have to agree with this, because only those who acquire fanaticism can blindly believe every spoken word, arguing that every spoken phrase is endowed with meaning and is the Truth.

Who wrote the Bible. Historians' opinion

Various researchers who are inclined to compare historical monuments believe that most of the events described in the Bible have already been described in other books or legends of ancient peoples. Indeed, it is impossible not to see the obvious similarity of the New Testament with the most common legends of different nationalities: Odin, Hercules, Hercules, Osiris. All these characters were the children of some deity, sent to our world in various ways, carried the Divine truth and died (died not by their own death). But even historians are inclined to penetrate into the Divine light, they often begin to look for some kind of code that allows them to understand the truth of the universe. It is still too early to judge its existence, as well as the expediency of its search. Time will show everything.

Who Really Wrote the Bible

Ready for a truly objective answer? But in order to fully answer this question, we will first have to pay attention to what the Bible consists of: these are, first of all, the numerous stories of the misadventures of the Jewish people, which end well thanks to the intervention from above. An approximate structure of each of them: a description of the problem, a description of the difficulties, getting rid of the difficulties. And some stories are completely instructive and contain morality ("Expulsion from Paradise", parables), which can be safely applied to today's life without fear of making a mistake. It turns out that the Bible is a historical work, a description of the history of one people, based on real events and flavored with the legends of the area in which it happened to be. This is with regard to the Old Testament (by the way, a small part of another sacred book - the Torah). The New Testament is a description of the life of a real-life person engaged in the promotion of new views, written down by one of his followers. You can also find instructive stories and clever thoughts in it, but it remains a work of art.

Not all people can answer the question: what is the Bible, although it is the most famous and widespread book on the planet. For some, this is a spiritual landmark, for others - a story that describes several thousand years of the existence and development of mankind.

This article provides answers to frequently asked questions: who invented the Holy Scripture, how many books are in the Bible, how old is it, where did it come from, and at the end will be given a link to the text itself.

What is the Bible

The Bible is a collection of writings compiled by various authors. The Holy Scriptures are written in different literary styles, and the interpretation proceeds from these styles. The purpose of the Bible is to bring the words of the Lord to the people.

The main topics are:

  • creation of the world and man;
  • the fall into sin and the expulsion of people from paradise;
  • the life and faith of the ancient Jewish peoples;
  • the coming of the Messiah to earth;
  • life and suffering of the Son of God Jesus Christ.

Who Wrote the Bible

The Word of God was written by different people and at different times. Its creation was carried out by holy people close to God - the apostles and prophets.

Through their hands and minds, the Holy Spirit conveyed to people the truth and righteousness of God.

How many books are in the bible

The composition of the Holy Scripture of the Russian Orthodox Church includes 77 books. The Old Testament is based on 39 canonical writings and 11 non-canonical ones.

The Word of God, written after the birth of Christ, contains 27 sacred books.

What language is the Bible written in?

The first chapters were written in the language of the ancient Jews - Hebrew. The texts, compiled during the life of Jesus Christ, were written in Aramaic.

For the next few centuries, the Word of God was written in Greek. Seventy interpreters were involved in translating into Greek from Aramaic. Servants of the Orthodox Church use texts translated by interpreters.

The first Slavic Holy Scripture was translated from the Greek language and is the first book to appear in Russia. The translation of the sacred assemblies was entrusted to the brothers Cyril and Methodius.

During the reign of Alexander I, the Bible texts were translated from Slavonic into Russian. It was then that the Synodal Translation appeared, which is also popular in the modern Russian Church.

Why is it the Holy Book of Christians

The Bible is not just a holy book. This is a handwritten source of human spirituality. From the pages of Scripture, people draw the wisdom sent by God. The Word of God is a guide for Christians in their worldly life.

Through the Bible texts, the Lord communicates with people. Helps to find answers to the most difficult questions. The books of Holy Scripture reveal the meaning of being, the secrets of the origin of the world and the definition of a person's place in this world.

By reading the Word of God, a person comes to know himself and his actions. Getting closer to God.

Gospel vs Bible - What's the Difference?

Holy Scripture is a collection of books divided into the Old and New Testaments. The Old Testament describes the time from the creation of the world until the coming of Jesus Christ.

The gospel is the part that makes up the Bible texts. Included in the New Testament portion of Scripture. In the Gospel, the description begins from the birth of the Savior to the Revelation that he gave to His Apostles.

The gospel consists of several works written by different authors and tells the story of the life of Jesus Christ and His deeds.

What are the parts of the Bible?

Biblical texts are divided into canonical and non-canonical parts. Non-canonical include those that appeared after the creation of the New Testament.

The structure of the canonical portion of Scripture includes:

  • legislative: Genesis, Exodus, Deuteronomy, Numbers and Leviticus;
  • historical content: those that describe the events of holy history;
  • poetic content: Psalms, Proverbs, Songs of Songs, Ecclesiastes, Job;
  • prophetic: writings of great prophets and small ones.

Non-canonical texts are also divided into prophetic, historical, poetic and legislative texts.

Orthodox Bible in Russian - the text of the Old and New Testaments

Reading Bible texts begins with a desire to know God's Word. The clergy advise the laity to start reading from the pages of the New Testament. After reading the New Testament books, a person will be able to understand the essence of the events described in the Old Testament.

To understand the meaning of what is written, you need to have at hand the works that give the transcript of the Holy Scriptures. An experienced priest or confessor can answer the questions that have arisen.

The Word of God can provide answers to many questions. The study of Bible texts is an important part of the life of every Christian. Through them, people come to know the grace of the Lord, become better and spiritually draw closer to God.

How the Bible was written

The oldest writing material was stone, and the tool for writing was a chisel. The first mention of writing in the Bible is associated with the story of the Ten Commandments carved in stone.

Tablets for writing were made of wood or ivory and covered with a layer of wax. They were used by the Assyrians, Greeks and Romans. Sometimes two boards were connected with hinges. A pointed stick served as a writing tool.

The Babylonians used clay thin rectangular plates for writing. The words were imprinted on the surface of soft clay with a triangular style, and then the tablet was dried in the sun. Archaeologists have found entire "libraries" of such clay tablets. Often they used fragments of broken dishes, “shards”, on which they made notes for memory, made up bills and even lists of necessary purchases. The ink was prepared from soot diluted in vegetable oil or gum.

Even before the era of the construction of the pyramids, the Egyptians learned how to make papyrus from the core of the Nile reed that grew in marshy places. Wet thick stems were laid in rows, one on top of the other, and beaten with a mallet until a thin sheet was obtained. Then the sheet was dried, and it was possible to write on it. Papyrus was expensive, but they learned to use it more than once, washing away or scraping off previous records. The Egyptians wrote with reed brushes, and the ink was obtained from plant sap, infused with certain types of insects.

The skins of sheep, goats, calves and antelopes were dried, scraped and cleaned, and then stretched and beaten with a mallet to obtain a smooth, even surface for writing. This is how a material called parchment was made. Writing implements were made from reeds by sharpening and splitting one end of the reed stick.

Languages ​​of the Bible

Alphabet

About 1500 B.C. in Canaan someone had the wonderful idea of ​​inventing a symbol - a letter - for every sound in the language. It took only about 25 letters. Now it was not necessary to memorize hundreds of different icons to convey hundreds of different words. Any word could be written down simply by listening to its sounds and selecting the appropriate letters. This brilliant idea was quickly adopted by speakers of other languages.

Hebrew

Most of the Old Testament is written in Hebrew. The Hebrew alphabet has 22 letters for consonants (the reader had to substitute the vowels himself). The text is read from right to left, so the book is turned from left to right and the beginning is where we are used to seeing the last page.

Aramaic

The Aramaic language was widely spoken in the Persian Monarchy - the leading power of the Near and Middle East for two hundred years (starting from about 550 BC). Aramaic became the language of merchants throughout this region. Some parts of the Old Testament books of Daniel, Ezra, and Jeremiah were written in Aramaic.
However, Hebrew remained the language of prayer and worship. Educated people still understood Hebrew, although when the Hebrew Bible was read aloud in the synagogues, it was not uncommon for the translator to explain the meaning in Aramaic. Manuscripts of portions of the Old Testament written in Aramaic have survived; they are called "targums".

Greek language

In 331 B.C. Alexander the Great conquered Persia. He ruled almost all of the known ancient world, and "everyday" Greek became the language most people understood. The followers of Jesus wanted the whole world to hear the Good News; so the Aramaic spoken by Jesus was translated into Greek. Only a few places have preserved the original Aramaic words (for example, the word "abba", meaning "father"). Addressing the daughter of Jairus, Jesus said: “Talitha kumi,” was the Aramaic phrase spoken by Him. The Gospel writers also gave us a Greek translation: “Girl, I say to you, get up” (Mk 5:41). The Greek alphabet has 24 letters and was the first to include letters for vowels. Greek was written from left to right. In the Revelation of John the Theologian (Rev. 1:8) God says: “I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end...” (alpha and omega are the first and last letters of the Greek alphabet).

Who Wrote the Bible


The modern Bible is usually a very thick book with over a thousand pages. Different parts of the Bible were written by different people over a long period of time, probably up to 1500-2000 years. Only later were these numerous parts collected in one book. Famous stories with ancient Jewish characters - Moses and the Ten Commandments, Joseph and his colorful clothes, David and Goliath - happened about 3,500 years ago and were recorded around the same time.

oral tradition

The first stories in the Bible date back to prehistoric times, long before writing was invented.
They were transmitted in exactly the same way as children's play songs are transmitted today - by constant repetition.
This transmission of stories is called oral tradition. In the evenings around the fires, during worship, at work and at war, people sang songs and told stories they had learned in childhood. These stories were treated with the greatest reverence because they were about God. Every word was important, and it had to be repeated correctly.

book tradition

Scholars cannot say exactly when the books of the Old Testament appeared: their writing continued for several centuries. By the 3rd century BC, the Jews recognized some of their books as “sacred,” written under the direct inspiration of God. They were formally recognized as such by the Council at Yavne (Jamnia) in A.D. 90, and became the books of the Old Testament as we know it now; however, we arrange them in a slightly different order.

New Testament

Jesus of Nazareth was born much later than the writing of the Old Testament books, exactly two thousand years ago. But stories about him at first were also transmitted orally. Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John wrote four gospels based on eyewitness accounts of the life of Jesus. All the accounts of Jesus' birth in Bethlehem, of His life, and of the miracles He performed that we learn from the Gospels, were recorded prior to A.D. 100. The books of Matthew, Mark, and Luke are commonly referred to as the Synoptic Gospels; they seem to be based on the same oral traditions about the life of Jesus and His teachings.

The apostle Paul and other authoritative mentors wrote epistles in which they explained to believers the points of faith and taught them Christian behavior. The first of these epistles appeared about A.D. 50, before the gospels were written. As the apostles and first-generation Christians began to die, the younger believers tried to piece together the authentic scriptures that most accurately told about Jesus and His teachings. By about A.D. 100, the Church recognized as inspired most of the writings we know as the New Testament, and by about A.D. 200, the 27-book canon of the New Testament that we know today was recognized as inspired.

The Dead Sea Scrolls In 1947, a Bedouin shepherd tending a herd of sheep in a desert hilly area west of the Dead Sea noticed the entrance to a cave on one of the sheer cliffs. He threw a stone there and suddenly heard the sound of breaking pottery. Intrigued by this, he climbed into the cave and found many clay vessels there. Continuing his research, he discovered scrolls of parchment inside the vessels, covered with ancient Hebrew writing. His find did not arouse interest in anyone, but when archaeologists saw these scrolls, a real stir began. Over time, about 400 scrolls were discovered in the caves around the place called Qumran, which turned out to be the library of the Jewish religious sect of the Essenes. The scrolls contained parts of all the books of the Hebrew Old Testament, with the exception of the Book of Esther. At the time of Christ, an ascetic community of the Essenes lived near this place, who founded a settlement, which was excavated by scientists. A watchtower, a refectory, a scriptorium, where the Dead Sea scrolls were probably copied, as well as ritual pools, a pottery workshop and a cemetery, were opened here. Qumran Radiocarbon analysis has shown that the Dead Sea Scrolls were written between 200 B.C. and A.D. 70. The Isaiah Scroll is almost complete; it is 1,000 years older than the next most ancient list of Isaiah, but both texts are almost identical. This shows how accurate the scribes were, how seriously they took their work.




When the Bible was written, the usual books with pages for us had not yet been invented. People wrote on scrolls. They were made from sheets of papyrus, parchment, or even thin sheets of copper, stitched or glued together to form a long ribbon, up to ten meters long and thirty centimeters wide. The ends of the tape were wound on wooden rods: the reader unrolled the scroll with one hand, and wound it onto the second rod with the other. Having finished reading, the scrolls were wrapped in cloth and put away for safety in tall vessels.

Birth of the book

Carrying scrolls from place to place was inconvenient; it also took a long time to find any short biblical passage in a long scroll. In the II century. Christians put together the books of the New Testament. They were probably the first to abandon the scrolls. Instead, they came up with the idea of ​​combining several sheets of papyrus or parchment into a notebook, folding them in half and sewing along the fold, and then adding the same notebooks further. This early type of book is called a "code"




The earliest known complete copy of the New Testament was written shortly after A.D. 300. It is called the Codex Sinaiticus because it was found at the foot of Mount Sinai, in the monastery of St. Catherine. In 1844, the German scholar Konstantin Tischendorf, while visiting this secluded monastery, discovered several parchments with early Greek texts. It turned out that the manuscripts contained part of the Old Testament and dated back to the 4th century. according to R. Kh. Tischendorf, excited by his discovery, revisited the monastery and eventually found so many sheets in it that an almost complete Bible was collected. The Codex Sinaiticus is currently kept in the British Museum in London. Other important early manuscripts of the Greek Bible include the Codex Vaticanus, now in the Vatican Library, and the Codex Alexandrinus, in the British Museum.

How the Bible Came to Us

Jewish scribes

In ancient times, scribes were especially respected because they were often the only ones who could read, make wills, and keep accounts. When new scrolls of the Old Testament were required, each word had to be painstakingly copied, and it was the sacred duty of the scribes to preserve the text and explain it. In order for scribes to realize the importance of their work and not make mistakes, strict rules were developed. For example:

Every day the scribe had to begin his work with a prayer;
- instead of the name of God, a gap was left, which was filled by a person who wrote with more “clean” ink;
- having finished copying this or that section, the scribe counted the number of lines, words and letters in the original and compared with what he got in the copy. He found and checked the central word in each section.

Mistakes still happened. But it is estimated that on average there was one error per 1580 letters.

Septuagint

For the first time the Old Testament was translated from Hebrew into Greek in the III - II centuries. BC This translation is known as the Septuagint (from the Latin numeral "seventy" according to tradition, the translation was completed by seventy scholars). The Jews by this time had spread throughout the Mediterranean and often spoke Greek rather than Hebrew. The said translation was made in Alexandria in Egypt for the fabulously huge Alexandrian library.

monks

"Monk" in Greek means "a person who lives alone." The first Christian monk was Anthony, who lived in the deserts of Egypt from about 270 to 290 BC. according to R. H. His example was followed by others. More often, however, men (and separately women) lived in groups in monasteries, spending their days in prayer, Bible study and labor - doing agriculture or caring for the sick.

census takers

In the Dark Ages that came after the collapse of the Roman Empire, the texts of the Holy Scriptures were kept and protected by the monks. Each codex was copied by hand. This was a long and laborious undertaking. Sometimes mistakes occurred, perhaps due to the fatigue of the monk, or from the poor lighting in which they worked then. Sometimes the scribe even consciously made changes, desiring to state the Scripture in his own words or to bring the text into line with his own understanding. Often the monks worked in the scriptorium, i.e. a room where everyone sat at their desk in complete silence. In such rooms there were no stoves and lighting due to the risk of fire. The work of a scribe was tiresome. There was such a proverb: "The pen is held by two fingers, but the whole body works."




Bible translation

By AD 300, the New Testament had been translated into several languages, including Latin, Coptic, and Syriac. The Syriac Bible was called the Peshitta, or "plain" version. Syrian preachers brought the Gospel and the whole Bible to China, India, Armenia and Georgia.
The Armenian and Georgian alphabets were probably created specifically to translate the Bible into these languages. The Bible was also translated into Coptic (a late form of ancient Egyptian), the language of North African Christians.

bible for ready

Until the 4th century no one wrote down the language of the Germanic people of the Ostrogoths. But ok. 350 Bishop Ulfilas translated the Bible into the Ostrogoth language and thus fixed it. The best surviving copy of this translation is the Codex Argenteus (Silver Codex), now in Uppsala, Sweden, written in gold and silver on purple parchment.

A scientist named Jerome, born in northern Italy c. 345 A.D., the mistakes made by the scribes of the Bible were very disturbing. He traveled widely, learned many languages ​​and copied many parts of the Bible. OK. In AD 382, ​​Pope Damas asked Jerome to prepare a new complete translation of the Gospels, as well as the Psalter and other Old Testament books, in an attempt to get rid of the errors that had crept in.

Vulgate

At that time, most Christians in the West spoke Latin and found it difficult to understand the Greek New Testament, but the numerous translations into Latin seemed clumsy and inaccurate. Jerome, who settled in a secluded monastery in Bethlehem in 386, began translating the original Hebrew and Greek texts of the entire Bible into Latin. A Jewish rabbi helped him learn Hebrew and translate the Old Testament from the original. This work took twenty-three years. Jerome's completed translation became more and more popular over time. Known as the Vulgate, the "folk" version, it is from the 8th century. until 1609 was the only Bible used by the Roman Catholic Church.

precious books

Irish tradition

In the V - VI centuries. Irish monks went to Scotland and Northern England, where they traveled, spoke about the Christian faith and founded monasteries. These monks brought with them the art of Celtic drawings. Superbly decorated books were produced in distant monasteries nestled on bleak cliffs and islands. A monk could work all his life on one book, thus showing his love for God.

How the books were decorated

At that time, books were made from the finest calfskin, or from the skin of sheep and goats. Copying a page of Holy Scripture After a monk completed the copying of the Latin text in beautiful, graceful handwriting, his work was checked. Over time, the monks began not only to copy the texts, but also to decorate the pages. These colorized books are called illuminated manuscripts. Sometimes scribes placed a drawn border with complex patterns on the page. The initial letter of the first word of a chapter or paragraph could be enlarged so that it occupied almost the entire page, and then decorated with patterns, flowers, and even small figures. The monks created complex, intertwining compositions of curved lines, spirals, whorls, shields, which included tiny but carefully crafted images of animals and birds. They used homemade watercolor paints, and sometimes added thin sheet gold for greater effect. Pointed bird feathers and simple brushes served as tools, but even with them scribes achieved amazing results.

Gospels from Kels

There is one small drawing (1.6 sq. cm) in the Book of Kells, which is made up of 158 tiny interlaced elements. This colored manuscript is the greatest masterpiece of Celtic and Anglo-Saxon art. Work on the manuscript began in the 7th century. in a monastery located on the island of Iona in Western Scotland. After the Viking raid, the book was taken to Kelly Monastery in Ireland, where it was finished. The book has 339 sheets measuring 33x25 cm, and each of them is richly decorated. Now the book is stored in Trinity College (Dublin, Ireland).

Lindisfarne Gospels

In 635 a monastery was founded on Lindisfarne, an island off the northeast coast of England. The Lindisfarne Gospels, outstanding examples of illuminated manuscripts, were copied and decorated in this monastery c. 700 After about 300 years, the priest Aldred entered between the lines of the Latin text a translation into Anglo-Saxon (Old English) language.

Golden Gospels

The Golden Gospels are a series of marvelous illuminated manuscript Gospels created in 8th century France under the supervision of Alcuin, who came from York in England. The inscriptions in them are made mainly in gold, and the decorations are made in silver and gold, and all this on the finest calfskin dyed with purple. From VI century. a copy of the Bible, translated into the Gothic language by Ulfila, has arrived; it is also written in gold and silver on purple-dyed parchment.

Bibles in chains

Most of the Bibles were decorated much more modestly than the Book of Kel or the Golden Gospels. But even a simple rewriting of books took years. Bibles were very expensive, and when a finished book was exhibited in a monastery chapel or cathedral, it often had to be chained to a lectern or pulpit to prevent theft.






In the Middle Ages, most of the Bibles were written in Latin, that is, in a language incomprehensible to ordinary people. Some daredevils decided to change this state of affairs - to translate the Bible into the vernacular.

Waldo's translations

Around 1175, Peter Waldo, a wealthy merchant living in France, in Lyon, decided to devote his life to God. Taking the words of Jesus literally, he distributed all his possessions. The followers of Waldo, the Waldensians, translated the Bible into Provençal and probably also into Italian, German, Piedmontese (Northern Italian), and Catalan (spoken in northeastern Spain).

Alphabet for Slavs

In the 9th century, two brothers, Christians Cyril and Methodius from the city of Thessaloniki in Greece, set out to preach to the Slavs of Eastern Europe. For their own purposes, they translated the Bible into Old Church Slavonic. To record the translation, they invented an alphabet that became the prototype of the Cyrillic alphabet (on behalf of one of the brothers), which is still used today in southeastern Europe and Russia. Here the titles of the Gospels are written in Church Slavonic Cyrillic.

Jan Hus

In the XV century. in Prague, the capital of Bohemia (now part of the Czech Republic), the rector of Charles University Jan Hus (1374-1415) began his speeches against the greed, licentiousness and ambition of the priests. He was greatly influenced by the teachings of Wycliffe. For openly expressing his views, Hus was accused of heresy, imprisoned, and eventually burned at the stake. However, the followers of Hus began to translate the Bible into Czech, and the New Testament in Czech was printed in 1475.

The very first Bible book translated into Anglo-Saxon was the Psalter; this translation was made about 700 by Bishop Aldhelm of Sherborne. Later, Bede the Venerable, abbot of a monastery in Yarrow (north-east England), shortly before his death in 735, translated part of the Gospel of John.

John Wycliffe

John Wycliffe (1329-1384) dreamed of translating the Bible into English so that Holy Scripture would be accessible to the common people. It annoyed him that only priests could decide which parts of the Bible to read and how they should be interpreted. Wycliffe taught at Oxford University until he was expelled for criticizing these and other shortcomings of the church. Wycliffe was later tried as a heretic, and some of his valuable books were publicly burned at the stake. Wycliffe's followers, Nicholas of Hereford and John Purvey, translated the entire Bible into English; the work was completed in 1384. In 1408 Wycliffe's Bible was banned, but it was made in hundreds of copies and secretly sold. Since ordinary people then rarely knew how to read, the followers of Wycliffe - poor priests, or "Lollards" - went around the villages, reading and interpreting the Bible. Some of them died at the stake as heretics; during execution, their Bibles were hung around their necks. Nevertheless, about 170 copies of this translation have survived to this day.


typographyOne of the early printed Bibles In 1450, an event occurred that could not but influence the history of the spread of the Bible in the most decisive way: printing was invented (it is better to say, printing was rediscovered, because the Chinese began to print their books from 868 AD). X.). Johannes Gutenberg from Mainz (Germany) guessed that the text could be imprinted on parchment paper using wooden letters smeared with paint. In this way, it is easy to make hundreds of printed books instead of copying each one by hand. Gutenberg then began experimenting with metal type. The first book that Gutenberg printed in full was the Latin Bible (1458).

In 1978, one of the few surviving Gutenberg Bibles was purchased for £1,265,000. Although Johannes Gutenberg and the people of Mainz tried to keep their invention secret, their secret soon became known throughout Europe, from Rome and Paris to Krakow and London. In England, the first printing press was started by William Caxton (London, 1476). Soon Bibles were being printed everywhere. The Old Testament in Hebrew was first published in 1488 in Italy by the Soncino brothers.


Two great translators

Great Reformer Martin Luther

In the XV-XVI centuries. Europe is undergoing huge changes. There are more and more educated people who are able to independently judge religion and society. Disorder reigns in church affairs: many priests are dishonest or lazy, preaching their own ideas without reference to the Bible. One of those who rebelled against the existing order was the German priest Martin Luther, born in 1483. In those days, the doors of churches were often used as bulletin boards. And in October 1517, Martin Luther nailed to the door of the church in Wittenberg a sheet with 95 theses of religious reforms. Luther's activity led to great changes in the church, which we call the Reformation, and he himself went down in history as a reformer of the church.

Luther was outlawed and had to take refuge in the Wartburg castle. There Luther began translating the Scriptures into German so that others could experience the joy he himself found in reading the Bible. Luther believed that a good translation can only be done directly from the original language and must be created on the basis of everyday colloquial speech.
The complete "Lutherian Bible" - one of the first Bibles written in the language of the common people - was published in 1532. To this day, Luther's translation, which had a noticeable influence on the formation of the modern German language, remains the most beloved German Bible.

bible for drovers

The Wycliffe Bible contained many errors in translation and copying. Even after the invention of the printing press, the English did not have a properly printed Bible that they could read in their own language. The authorities considered it dangerous to allow ordinary people to read the Bible and decide for themselves how and what to believe. It was forbidden to translate and print any parts of the Bible. But an Englishman named William Tyndale once told a priest, "If God spares my life... I will make the peasant lad who drives the plow horses know more about the Bible than you know."

Bible smuggling

William Tyndale (1494-1536) - the greatest English translator of the Bible. Living in exile in Germany, he translated the New Testament from the Greek. In 1526 printed copies were smuggled into England in sacks of grain and baskets of fish. King Henry VIII ordered them to be burned. The translation of the Old Testament Tyndale did not have time to finish: he was betrayed, captured and burned at the stake in Belgium. Dying, he prayed: "Lord, open the eyes of the English king."


The bible can't be stopped

bible in dutch

Many translations of the Bible were based on Luther's Bible. A Protestant translation of the Bible into Dutch was made by Jakob Lisfeldt and published in 1526. The Roman Catholic Church produced a Dutch translation by Nicholas van Winge in 1548.

The Geneva Bible of 1560 was translated by English Protestants living in exile in Geneva. It was the most accurate English translation at that time; it is sometimes referred to as the "Pants Bible" because Genesis 3:7 in translation says that Adam and Eve "made pants for themselves." The translation was immediately used in the churches of Scotland.

King James Version

When King James I came to the English throne in 1603, two translations were in use: the Geneva Bible and the Bishop's Bible (Miles Coverdale's revised version of the Bible, issued in 1568). With the assistance of King James, it was decided to prepare a new edition based on these translations, as well as the original Greek and Hebrew texts. Fifty scientists were divided into six groups, each of which translated its part of the Bible, and the resulting text was checked by a commission, which included two scientists from each group. This "Approved Version", first printed in 1611, is still very popular due to its accuracy and beauty of the language.

portuguese bible

The New Testament in Portuguese (translated by Joao Ferreira d'Almeida) was published in Amsterdam in 1681. The complete Portuguese Bible did not appear until 1748-1773.

bible in spanish

The complete Spanish Bible, translated by Valencian Catalan, appeared in 1417, but all copies were destroyed by the Inquisition. The translation of the monk Cassiodorus de Rhine, who lived in exile, was published in 1569 in Basel (Switzerland). The Rhine translation, revised by the monk Cyprian de Valera, was reprinted in 1602 and became the accepted Protestant Bible in Spanish (Reine-Valera translation).

bible in french

The priest of the Roman Catholic Church, Jacques Lefevre d "Etaple, published a French translation of the New Testament in Paris in 1523. The church authorities, however, were suspicious of this enterprise, since Lefevre sympathized with the Reformation. Therefore, his complete translation of the Bible, which included non-canonical books of the Old Testament , Lefebvre had to print in Antwerp (modern Belgium), where the edition could not be confiscated. Translated from the Vulgate, this version became known as the Antwerp Bible. The first Protestant French Bible was printed in Neuchâtel (Switzerland) in the translation of Pierre Robert Olivetan, cousin of John Calvin The 1650 edition, often called the French Geneva Bible, became the recognized French Protestant Bible.Meanwhile, the French Roman Catholic Bible was produced at the University of Louvain in 1550 and is called the Louvain Bible.

Bible for Italy

The very first Italian Bible was printed in Venice in 1471. The Catholic Bible by Antonio Brucoli was published in 1530, and the first Protestant Bible in 1562. The most famous Protestant Bible, translated by Giovanni Diodati, appeared in 1607 in Geneva.

Bible in Russian

The Bible was published in Russia in 1518 in the Slavic language; it was based on a translation made in 863 by the brothers-preachers Cyril and Methodius. In Russian, the New Testament first appeared in 1821, and the Old Testament only in 1875.

swedish bible

In 1541 Sweden received the Uppsala Bible; the translation was made by Laurentis Petri, Archbishop of Uppsala.

Bible for Danes

Denmark became a predominantly Protestant country during the initial period of the Reformation. The first Danish translation of the New Testament appeared in 1524. The accepted Danish Version, printed in Copenhagen in 1550, is called the Bible of King Christian III, after the monarch who then ruled Denmark.


The Bible in the New World
By translating the Bible into most European languages, the Christians of Europe set their sights on other parts of the world.

Bible for Native Americans

In the 17th century, some English Christians, called "Puritans," felt that the established Church no longer adhered to the teachings of the Bible. A group of Puritans, known as the Pilgrim Fathers, set sail for North America in 1620 to start a new life there. Eleven years later, the English priest John Eliot (1604-1690) arrives in the New World with another group of colonists. After learning the language of the local Indians of Massachusetts, Eliot began to preach the gospel to them. By 1663 he had translated the entire Bible into the language of the Indians of Massachusetts. This Native American translation was the first Bible produced in North America.

South America

The first printed Bible book for the natives of South America was the Gospel of Luke in the Aymara language, published in 1829. The translation was made by Dr. Vincente Pazos-Canchi, a Peruvian who lived in London.

First Indian Bible

At the beginning of the XVIII century. representatives of the Danish pietist mission went to the East Indies. The German missionary Bartholomew Siegenbalg (1628-1719) translated the New Testament into Tamil; it is the very first translation of a part of the Bible into any of the languages ​​of India. He also managed to translate the Old Testament up to the Book of Ruth. Siegenbalg's translation was completed by another German pietist missionary, Christian Friedrich Schwartz (1726-1760). By 1800 the Bible had been translated into at least 70 languages. By 1900, at least one Bible book had been translated into more than 500 languages. How to explain such rapid changes? During this period, explorers began to travel all over the world; Entrepreneurs set up offices of their companies in distant countries. Often they invited priests to accompany their salesmen; William Carey's example inspired Christian enthusiasm for preaching and translating the Bible.

Africa

Explorers and missionaries like David Livingstone began visiting Africa in the 19th century. The Scotsman Robert Moffat translated the Bible into the Bechuan language. The translation of the Yoruba Bible was overseen by Ajay Crowther, a freed slave from Nigeria who became the first African bishop. The translation was completed 1884.

The Shoemaker Who Translated the Bible

When the young Englishman William Carey (1761-1834) left school, he was sent as an apprentice to a shoemaker. After becoming a Baptist, he began to study the New Testament and became a Baptist preacher. He independently mastered Latin, Ancient Greek, Hebrew, French and Dutch. Carey believed that Jesus' words, "Go and make disciples of all nations," were addressed not only to the apostles, but to Christians of all ages. Carey urged his listeners, "Expect great things from God.... Go for great things for God's sake." Through his zeal, the Baptist Missionary Society was formed in 1792.

Carey in India

In 1793, William Carey traveled to India with his wife and four children. There he earned a living as a foreman in an indigo dye factory, and in his spare time he learned several Indian languages. He soon began translating the Bible into Bengali. Ultimately, under his supervision, translations of the complete Bible into six local languages ​​were completed, and individual Bible books were translated into 29 more languages, including Sanskrit, Bengali, Marathi and Sinhalese. Carey's colleague, Joshua Marshman, set about translating the Bible into Chinese, as another Englishman, Robert Morrison, had already done. The complete Bible in Chinese was published in 1823.




bible and history

Excavated data are often subject to multiple interpretations, and their reliability remains relative. Absolute accuracy is rarely achieved. When did man appear? How old is the earth? When did Abraham live? When did the Exodus happen? How did the conquest of Canaan happen, by an invasion from outside or as a result of an internal social upheaval? Was Moses the author of the Pentateuch? Neither biblical criticism nor archaeological excavations can provide convincing answers to these questions. Sometimes it seems that archeology and biblical studies contradict each other. The problem is partly a failure to adequately understand the biblical text, partly a misinterpretation of the evidence from archeology. Some sites may have been misidentified, others unprofessional excavated, or the excavation data may have been erroneously assessed. Archeology can often help us understand things better, but it rarely clears up difficult passages in the Bible. To demand too much from her is to misunderstand her essence.

Acts of God

The Bible is a collection of books written over the centuries from the standpoint of Judaic monotheism. The biblical writers never set out to write history in the modern sense; their purpose was to demonstrate the deeds of God in Jewish history. The main contribution of archeology to the study of the Bible is that through it we can clarify and visualize the history in the context of which biblical faith arose. The Bible was not written in a vacuum, and the events it describes did not take place in a vacuum either. The ancient Jews were influenced by the cultures of other peoples with whom they came into contact, and the Bible records these influences, both good and bad. Biblical archeology penetrates deep into the area of ​​ancient history that gave birth to the Bible.

What is the meaning of these stones?

What is the value of archaeological discoveries to the reader of the Bible? Archeology's main contribution is not to apologetics. Undoubtedly, the results of archaeological work have clarified some of the difficulties. For example, in the Greek city of Thessaloniki, an inscription was found on a stone containing the word politarch, the term Luke uses in Acts 17:6 in relation to the Roman authorities. This has been considered a mistake by Bible critics, since prior to this discovery there was no evidence of the term being used. On the other hand, all attempts to find Joshua's Jericho or Solomon's Jerusalem have so far been mostly disappointing.

Exciting discoveries

Nevertheless, many exciting discoveries have been made that perfectly illustrate the Bible: the clay prism of Sennacherib (Sennacherib) mentioning King Hezekiah of Judah; the black obelisk of Shalmanassar with the image of the Jewish king Jehu bowing to him; the Babylonian chronicle, giving grounds to date the destruction of Jerusalem to 587 BC; cylinder of Cyrus, showing that the Persian monarch encouraged subject peoples, among whom were Jews, to return to their native lands and rebuild their cities and temples.

An inscription on the stone floor of the theater courtyard at Corinth containing the name of Erast, the city treasurer, possibly the same one mentioned in Rom. 16:23; winter palace of Herod the Great in Jericho and his burial place in Herodium. However, the famous archaeologist, the late Roland de Vaux, cautioned: “Archaeology cannot 'prove' the Bible. The truth of the Bible of a religious nature ... This spiritual truth can neither be proved nor refuted, it cannot be confirmed or discredited by the material finds of archaeologists. However, the Bible is written, to a large extent, as a historical narrative ... it is archeology that confirms this “historical” truth of the Bible.

The value of archeology

The greatest value of archeology to the student of the Bible lies in its ability to place our biblical faith in its historical context and to demonstrate the cultural context in which biblical events took place. For those who love the Bible, there is nothing more wonderful than to stand on the Mount of Olives in Jerusalem and inspect the results of archaeological excavations in the Holy City: here is part of the walls restored by Nehemiah; these are the steps that in the time of Jesus led up to the Temple; Excavations at Masada near the Dead Sea (Israel) here Hezekiah's Tunnel leading to the Pool of Siloam where Jesus opened the eyes of a blind man; these are the beautiful stones of the Temple, which the disciples pointed out to Jesus. And what a thrill to stroll through the chariot city of Solomon and Ahab at Megiddo; wander among the ruins of Caesarea Maritima, a majestic city on the Mediterranean, or among the pools built by the Essenes at Qumran, where the Dead Sea Scrolls were found. The aqueducts of Caesarea, the baths of Masada and Jericho, the synagogues of Galilee, the water tunnels of Megiddo, Hazor, Gezer and Jerusalem, the fortifications of Lachish, the altars of Bethlehem and Mount Ebal, the forums and temples of Samaria and Gerasa, the theaters of Amman and Ephesus - all this creates an indelible impression of civilization, once existed in these places. In our imagination, we can reconstruct these cities as they were in the days of Abraham, Solomon, Jesus, and Paul.

Historical context

The story of Jesus does not begin with "Once in a distant land..." but "When Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of King Herod..." (Mt 2:1). How wonderful it is to cross the hills of Judea, walk the streets of Bethlehem, wander around Nazareth, take a boat ride on the Sea of ​​Galilee or stroll through Jerusalem's Old City. What a thrill to follow every move of the archaeologist's shovel, realizing that it was here, in these very places, in historical and geographical reality, that the most precious heritage in history was handed down to mankind. That is the value of biblical archeology - that it allows you to place faith in the reality of ancient history.

BIBLE
a book containing the sacred writings of the Jewish and Christian religions. The Hebrew Bible, a collection of Hebrew sacred texts, is also included in the Christian Bible, forming its first part - the Old Testament. Both Christians and Jews consider it to be a record of an agreement (covenant) concluded by God with man and revealed to Moses on Mount Sinai. Christians believe that Jesus Christ announced a new covenant, which is the fulfillment of the Covenant given in Revelation to Moses, but at the same time replaces it. Therefore, the books that tell about the activities of Jesus and his disciples are called the New Testament. The New Testament is the second part of the Christian Bible.
Bible text. Most of the Old Testament books are written in Hebrew (Biblical Hebrew), but there are also passages in Aramaic, which Jews spoke after the 4th century. BC. Traditionally, the authorship of the Old Testament books is attributed to several leaders who became famous in Jewish history, including Moses, Samuel, David, Solomon. However, it is now established that many of the books are later compilations of ancient traditions and documents. The Book of Genesis, for example, contains fragments written in the 10th century. BC. and dating back to the oral tradition of 800 years ago, but the entire book was probably written down in its modern form no earlier than the 5th century. BC. The New Testament books appeared during the first century after the death of Jesus. They are written in Greek, although it is possible that one or two books were originally written in Aramaic and later translated into Greek. The authors of the New Testament books are considered to be the apostles and disciples of Jesus.
Bible canon. The list of books that in a particular religion are considered divinely inspired and recognized as sacred is called the canon. The canons of the Old and New Testaments were established much later than the books that compiled them were written. The canon of the Jewish Scriptures was probably completed in the 2nd century BC. BC, during the Hasmonean era. The biblical books were divided into three groups: "Law" or "Pentateuch" (Torah), constituting the quintessence of dogma; "Prophets" (Neviim) - a collection of historical and prophetic books; "Scriptures" (Ketuvim), containing narrative material, poetic works, prayers and aphorisms of worldly wisdom. The rabbis who gathered in Jamnia at the end of the 1st c. AD, tried to resolve the issue of exclusion from the canon of some books approved before, but still left them in the Bible. The history of the Christian canon of the Old Testament developed differently. In 3-2 centuries. BC. Among the Jews of the Diaspora, who spoke Greek, a translation into Greek of Jewish religious books was carried out, which was assigned the name of the Septuagint. The books of the Septuagint are arranged in a slightly different order: the Pentateuch, the Historical Books, the Poetic and Edifying Books, and the Prophetic Books. In addition, it contains some books excluded from the rabbinic canon. When Christianity began to spread among the Greeks, they used the Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible, the Septuagint. Currently, the Old Testament, used by the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Churches, is a collection of Old Testament books arranged in Septuagint order. The Protestant Old Testament contains only those books that are recognized as canonical in Judaism, but the order of the books of the Septuagint is preserved here. Books not included in the Jewish canon are either omitted or placed in an additional section as "Apocrypha". Just as with the Old Testament, the list of Christian writings considered canonical has changed over the centuries. The modern list, including 27 canonical New Testament books, recognized at one time by most of the main Christian sects, was formed by 367. It was officially recognized as final in 405.
Hebrew Bible. The modern Hebrew Bible basically follows the canon adopted in Jamnia. In Hebrew, it is called Kitwe Kodesh ("Holy Scriptures") or Tanakh (an abbreviation of Torah, Neviim, Ketuvim). The Hebrew text is still considered official and is used in worship. Its standard text is based on the edition of the Jewish scholar of the 10th century. Moshe ben Asher, who corrected numerous scribal errors accumulated over the centuries. A widely circulated edition contains, in addition to the Hebrew original, its translation into Aramaic, as well as a commentary by Rashi, the great scholar of the 11th century. The entire Bible is revered by the Jews as sacred, but the Torah is especially revered. Every synagogue has handwritten Torah scrolls. Thanks to the rule that no scroll of the Torah can be destroyed, many of its ancient manuscripts have been preserved, which otherwise might have been lost. In the first centuries of our era, a code of oral law (Mishnah) and a commentary on it (Gemara) were formed in Judaism. They expanded the system of biblical commandments, turning it into a set of prescriptions covering all aspects of Jewish life. Mishnah and Gemara in the 6th c. were compiled into one book called the Talmud. The Talmud is a highly revered book in Judaism, the formal and ritual side of which is determined by Holy Scripture in the Talmudic interpretation. The Jewish tradition of biblical exegesis is exceptionally rich. Rabbinic texts use a sophisticated system of interpretive techniques ("middot") to explain and apply biblical texts to life. Interpretation ("derash") was carried out at various levels, and the literal meaning of the text ("peshat") retained significance on its own level. Philo of Alexandria (c. 20 BC - 40 AD) used an allegorical way of interpreting the Bible, thus influencing later Christian exegesis even more than Jewish. Medieval Jewish commentators on the Bible (Rashi, ibn Ezra, Kimchi, Nachmanides, etc.) were mainly engaged in identifying the literal meaning, relying on new philological methods, but along with this, the philosophical and mystical schools of interpretation flourished.

Catholic Bible. The Roman Catholic Church traditionally uses the Latin translation of the Bible. The early church in Rome used several Latin translations from the Septuagint and the Greek New Testament. In 382, ​​Pope Damasus commissioned Jerome, a prominent philologist and scholar, to make a new translation of the Bible. Jerome revised existing Latin versions based on the Greek original and edited the Old Testament based on Hebrew manuscripts. The translation was completed ca. 404. Subsequently, he supplanted other Latin translations, and he began to be called "generally accepted" (Vulgata versio). The first printed book (the famous Gutenberg Bible, 1456) was an edition of the Vulgate. The Catholic Bible contains 73 books: 46 books of the Old Testament and 27 books of the New Testament. Since the Old Testament here derives from the Septuagint and not from the Hebrew Bible approved by the Sanhedrin of Jamnia, there are seven books not included in the Jewish canon, as well as additions to the Books of Esther and Daniel. In addition, the Septuagint follows the order of the books in the Catholic Bible. The main canonical edition of the Vulgate was published in 1592 by order of Pope Clement VIII and was called the Clement edition (editio Clementina). It repeats the text of Jerome (404), with the exception of the Psalter, which is presented in Jerome's revision before it was revised to take into account the Hebrew originals. In 1979, the church approved a new edition of the Vulgate (Vulgata Nova), which takes into account the latest achievements of biblical studies. The first translations of the Catholic Bible into English were made directly from the Vulgate. The most famous and widely used translation was the Douay-Rheims Version, 1582-1610. However, in 1943, Pope Pius XII issued a strict order to biblical scholars in their translation activities to rely henceforth only on ancient Aramaic and Hebrew manuscripts. This resulted in new translations of the Bible. The position of the Roman Catholic Church regarding the authority of the Bible was formulated at the Council of Trent (1545-1563). In contrast to the Protestant reformers, who saw in the Bible the only foundation of their faith, the fourth session of the council (1546) decreed that Tradition - the part of Revelation not written in Holy Scripture, but transmitted in the teaching of the church - has equal authority with the Bible. Catholics were not allowed to read the Bible in translations that were not approved by the church and without comments consistent with church Tradition. For some time reading Bible translations required the permission of the pope or the Inquisition. At the end of the 18th century this restriction was lifted, and since 1900 the reading of the Bible by the laity was even officially encouraged by church authorities. At the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965), the relationship between Scripture and Tradition was discussed: should they be considered as independent "sources of Revelation" (a more conservative point of view) or as sources that complement each other, "like two electric arcs in one searchlight."



Orthodox Bible. The Orthodox Church consists of a number of related but independent churches, most of which are Greek and Slavic churches. The Bible of the Greek churches uses the Septuagint as the Old Testament and the original Greek texts of the New Testament. The Orthodox Bible is a translation of the Greek Bible into one of the dialects of the Old Bulgarian language (the language of this translation is traditionally called Church Slavonic). Like the Catholic Church, the Orthodox Church bases its faith on Holy Tradition and Holy Scripture.
Protestant Bibles. There is no single Protestant Bible: all Protestant Bibles are translations made in the 16th century. during or after the Reformation. Even the King James Version has never gained the status of an official translation of the Church of England, although it is often referred to as the Officially Approved Translation (Authorized Version). In the Middle Ages, the Roman Catholic Church discouraged translations of the Vulgate for fear that without church guidance the text might be distorted or that the words of the Bible might be misunderstood. However, the Protestant reformers of the early 16th century believed that God directly addresses man through the Bible and that reading and studying the Bible is the right and duty of every Christian. Translations were needed in order to give the Bible to the majority of Christians, for whom Latin was a dead language. "How can people think about what they cannot understand?" asks one of the translators in the preface to the King James Version. The Reformers were not the first translators of the Bible (in the period after the invention of printing and before the advent of Luther's Bible, 17 editions in German were published in Germany). The Protestant Reformers either promoted translations or took it upon themselves to translate the Bible into the languages ​​of their own countries. They took as a basis not the Vulgate, but the Hebrew text of the Old Testament and the Greek text of the New Testament. In the early 20s of the 16th century. Luther translated the New Testament into German, Jacobus Faber into French, and William Tyndale into English. Translations of the Old Testament were made by the same translators in the next decade. Since then, many Protestant translations have been published.
Bible interpretation. During the first centuries of the Christian era, biblical texts were thought to have multiple meanings. The Alexandrian school of theology, influenced by Philo, developed a system of interpreting biblical texts as allegories, behind which were hidden truths in addition to their literal meaning. Everything in the Bible was considered from a Christian point of view, and the independent meaning of the Old Testament was actually ignored. Old Testament events and their participants have been universally interpreted as types of events and characters in the New Testament; this method of interpretation is called typological. So, Jonah, vomited on the third day from the belly of a whale, was interpreted as a prototype of Christ, who resurrected on the third day after the crucifixion. A rival theological school in Antioch developed a doctrine of the historical and literal meanings of biblical texts. This school rejected the search for allegories, except in cases of their conscious use. The Latin Church Fathers tried to find a compromise between the extreme positions of the Alexandrian and Antiochian schools. In general, theologians were attracted by the system of figurative meanings. By the 11th-12th centuries. A classification has become generally accepted that distinguishes four kinds of meanings (it is widely used to this day): 1) literal or historical meaning; 2) a figurative or metaphorical sense that relates the given text to Christ or his church; 3) an anagogical sense, revealing spiritual or heavenly truths; and, finally, 4) the moral meaning, relating to the soul and giving instructions for life practice.
Reformation. Protestant reformers of the 16th century rejected metaphorical interpretations and returned to the direct, historical meaning of the Bible. They were guided by the following principle: "The Scripture itself is its own interpreter"; they held that God directly enlightened the minds of those who, in Calvin's phrase, read "as if they had heard these words from the mouth of God himself." Nevertheless, various Protestant denominations have developed different approaches to interpreting biblical texts. Luther, for example, believed that the Bible contains the Word of God, but is not itself the Word of God. This position allowed him to distinguish in it books of greater or lesser spiritual significance. Quakers insisted that the Holy Spirit could enlighten a person both directly and through the Bible. The Puritans saw the Bible as a codification of the law governing any public or private activity. In the 18th century Methodists and other currents preached that in the Bible, God speaks exclusively about the salvation of man through Jesus Christ, and nothing else should be looked for in it.
Doubts about the authority of the Bible. Starting from the 17th century. the development of the natural and human sciences has given rise to new problems in the interpretation of the Bible. Astronomers, geologists and biologists painted a completely different picture of the Universe than in Holy Scripture. A number of scholars have concluded that the Bible has undergone many changes. Thus doubts were sown about the literal accuracy and traditional authorship of the biblical books. And finally, the rationalist spirit of the late 19th - early 20th centuries. reflected the secular belief in the progress of mankind and the perception of the Bible as a relic, or even simply as a collection of superstitions. The result of new research has been the suggestion that the Bible is not the unchanging Word of God, but rather the historical evidence of man's search for God. First, the Catholic Church declared as heretical the results of historical and natural science research that undermined the traditional teachings of the Church. Later, under Pope Pius XII (1939-1958), the church began to encourage scientific research, declaring that their results, provided they were true, could not affect church traditions and dogmas. Protestant theology is divided into two camps. Fundamentalists insist on the literal truth of the Bible and will not accept any study by biblical scholars or natural scientists if the results contradict the Word of the Bible. Other Protestants, especially the theologians and scientists of the so-called. historical-critical direction, are leading in new critical studies. One of the schools of Protestant thought calls for the "demythologization" of biblical thought in order to remove the contradictions between natural scientific discoveries and the pre-scientific picture of the world presented in the Bible. Other Protestants argue that God cannot be known through scientific or historical methods, and that the growing body of information regarding the authorship of the Bible books, the historical setting at the time they were written, and the changes made to them fail to negate the importance of key concepts of sin, redemption, and Revelation.
Bible studies. The scientific study of biblical texts is subdivided into two related disciplines: textual criticism and historical-critical analysis. The task of textual criticism is to restore the original text of the biblical books. Historical-critical studies analyze the authorship of the text, the time of its creation, purpose, style, form and, if possible, oral predecessors.
Textology. The need for criticism of the text arises due to the fact that the original manuscripts of the Bible have been lost, and the most ancient lists that have come down to us differ significantly. The earliest complete manuscripts of the New Testament date from the 4th century BC. Until 1947, when the Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered, containing parts of almost all the Old Testament books and written between 200 B.C. and 100 AD, scientists had at their disposal the oldest lists of the Old Testament, dating back to the 9th-11th centuries. AD, with the only exception - a fragment of the Pentateuch of the 2nd century. BC. In the era of antiquity and the Middle Ages, all texts were copied by hand and contain scribal errors. There were frequent cases of adding, changing, repeating and skipping words. Sometimes whole sections were destroyed or redrawn, often with a radical change in the meaning of the text. Biblical textual scholars from antiquity (among the Jews, starting with the Masoretes, and among Christian biblical scholars, with Jerome) strived for accuracy, their work was based on a careful comparison of handwritten versions of the text. Nowadays, the establishment of generally accepted criteria for comparing manuscripts, the improvement of knowledge of ancient languages ​​and the discovery of new manuscripts have made it possible to put textual criticism on a scientific basis.
Historical-critical method. Historical criticism marks a new phase in biblical studies and has been formed on the premise that the Bible was written by humans. Specialists in the historical-critical method (whose origins were Protestant scholars) study the Bible like any written document, and do not take into account its place in the system of church doctrine. The purpose of historical criticism is to clarify the meaning that the biblical texts had at the time of their creation, and this allows them to speak to us, modern people, in a more understandable language. The historical-critical method has questioned the literal accuracy of most biblical texts, and for this reason has caused and still causes a lot of controversy. Modern Catholic scholars also make a significant contribution to historical critical research, primarily in the field of biblical archeology. Many Jewish biblical scholars work in the field of historical criticism of both the Old Testament and the New Testament, correcting the tendency of Christian scholars (even modernists) to see in the New Testament the spiritual completion of the Old, Old Testament.
OLD TESTAMENT
The basis of the text of the Old Testament accepted in modern editions is the Hebrew Bible. Initially it contained 24 books, divided into the following three sections: I. "Law": Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy. II. "Prophets", including "early prophets" ("neviim rishonim"): Joshua, Judges, Samuel, Kings, and "later prophets" ("neviim aharonim"): Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, 12 "minor prophets" . III. "Scriptures": Psalms, Job, Proverbs, Ruth, Song, Ecclesiastes, Lamentations, Esther, Daniel, Ezra, Chronicles. In modern editions, the books of Samuel, Kings and Chronicles are divided into two (in the Russian Synodal Translation of the Bible, the books of Samuel and Kings are called 1-4 Books of Kings, and Chronicles - 1-2 Books of Chronicles), the book of Nehemiah is singled out from the book of Ezra, and the book of the Twelve The Prophets is divided into 12 separate books, according to the number of prophets. In the Catholic Bible there are, in addition: Tobit, Judith, the Wisdom of Solomon, Baruch, 1-2 Maccabees, as well as additions to Esther and Daniel. All this, together with 1-2 Esdras (in the Vulgate 3-4 Esdras) and the Supplication of Manasseh, is called "apocrypha" in the Protestant Bible.
BOOKS OF THE OLD TESTAMENT
Pentateuch. The books describing the events from the creation of the world to the death of Moses are called the Torah, or the Pentateuch. In antiquity, the manuscripts of the Pentateuch, due to the large amount of text, could not be written on one parchment scroll of the usual size, so the Torah was divided into the currently accepted five books (Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy), written on separate scrolls . These scrolls were kept in clay vessels (Greek teuchos), hence the Greek term Pentateuchos, "five vessels (for scrolls)". The oldest texts included in it date from the time of the "patriarchs" (18th century BC), and the latest sections could not have been written before the resettlement of the Jews in Babylon (6th century BC). In the 5th c. BC. all this material, combined and edited by the Jerusalem temple scribes, took on its present form. And only then, perhaps, in the 2nd c. BC, there was an idea of ​​the authorship of Moses. Despite the ideological, linguistic and stylistic diversity of its parts, the Pentateuch is a very integral monument. Its central theme is the connection between the fate of Israel and the plan of God, revealed in the creation of the world and man. The early narratives in the Book of Genesis - the fall of Adam and Eve, the death of mankind in the universal flood, the daring attempt of man to reach heaven with the help of the Tower of Babel - speak of the distance of the human race from its Creator, of the movement of people through wars and violence to chaos and destruction. However, with the advent of Abraham, there is hope. God chose Abraham's descendants to be a model in which "all the families of the earth shall be blessed." The following is the history of Abraham's descendants: his sons Isaac and Ishmael, the sons of Isaac - Jacob and Esau, the son of Jacob - Joseph. The book ends with a story about Joseph, who rose to a high position in Egypt. The rest of the books focus on the activities of Moses and the conclusion of the covenant between God and Israel. The Book of Exodus tells of the liberation of the sons of Israel from Egyptian slavery and how God on Mount Sinai gave laws to Moses. The book of Leviticus deals mainly with the order of worship. The Book of Numbers tells of Israel's 40-year wandering in the wilderness. It contains the results of the census of the Israelite tribes and some additional laws. In Deuteronomy, Moses instructs his fellow tribesmen before his death: he reminds them of the significance of the exodus from Egypt as an event that turned the Jews into the people of God, and briefly outlines the Law. This book ends with the story of the death of Moses on the border of the promised land. It is possible to single out four different layers of the material involved by the scribes in compiling the Pentateuch. These sources, commonly referred to as "codices", are now denoted by the Latin letters J, E, D, and P. None of them have come down to us in their original form, but scholars have reconstructed much of their supposed content and their history. The oldest of the four sources is denoted by the letter J (Yahvist). In all likelihood, it was something like a national epic, compiled in the 11th-10th centuries. BC. from the traditions kept by the Jewish tribes who lived in Canaan. J is the source of the well-known Genesis stories. Among them are the second story about the creation of the world (ch. 2), stories about Adam and Eve, Noah and the flood, about the promise given by God to Abraham, about the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, about how Jacob outwitted his elder brother Esau, stealing his father's blessing. Codex J also contains much of the story of the exodus from Egypt and the wanderings in the wilderness, which are discussed in the books of Exodus and Numbers. Some of the material in Codex J survived outside the Pentateuch in the Book of Joshua. The name of the source J was given by one of its features associated with the sacred name of God. In Hebrew, where no vowels were written, the name of God was written with four consonants: JHWH (or YHWH), which may have been pronounced "Yahweh." According to the Book of Exodus, this name was unknown to people until God revealed it to Moses. However, in Codex J, the name JHWH is often used in stories about events that took place before the birth of Moses. Approximately from the 4th c. BC. the Jews did not pronounce the sacred name, but replaced it with the word Adonai (Lord). Bible translations tend to take this practice into account. Thus, in the Russian translation of the Book of Genesis, the word Lord often corresponds to the abbreviation JHWH and often indicates that the phrase with this word is taken from the J tradition. E (Elohist), the second source, is not as complete as J. It is a set loosely connected narratives and laws that probably circulated within the northern kingdom, Israel. This collection originated in the 8th century. BC, when Israel and Judah were separate kingdoms. Codex E contains many important narratives: about Abraham and Hagar, about Abraham's sacrifice of Isaac, about the exaltation of Joseph in Egypt. Among the legislative material is an early form of the Decalogue, or Ten Commandments (Ex. 20). This codex is denoted by the letter E, because in the narrative of events that took place before the revelation of the name JHWH, the deity is called exclusively Elohim (God). The third source, D (Deuteronomy), is a collection of documents compiled at the court during the period of Israelite judges and kings (12-8 centuries BC) and related to civil and criminal law, as well as religious matters. The version of the Decalogue in Deuteronomy 5 probably got there from D. After the kingdom of Israel was in 722 B.C. conquered by Assyria, this legislative material was written down by the surviving scribes who found refuge in the south, in Judea. It eventually formed the core of Deuteronomy (Deuteronomium), from whose Latin name the letter D is taken. The latest of the four sources of the Pentateuch, P (Priestly Code), was compiled by the Jerusalem priests in the Babylonian captivity (598-538 BC) after the fall of the Kingdom of Judah. These priests wanted to rework national memories in the light of their main task - the service of Yahweh in the Jerusalem Temple. Their final work was a combination of world history, cult rules, and genealogy based on many early sources. For example, the Decalogue in its modern form is version P, which is a reworking of versions E and D. The Priestly Code contains the first account of the creation of the world (Gen 1), as well as the account of God's contract with Abraham, which is a parallel text to text J Some chapters of the Book of Exodus, the entire Book of Leviticus, and many chapters from the Book of Numbers, which contain cult laws and make up a large part of the Pentateuch, are also included in source P.



"Prophets". Between the 9th and 5th centuries. BC. in Palestine, a movement of prophets arises, believing that God inspires them to proclaim their will to the chosen people. They scourged kings, priests and common people because they were mired in wickedness, turned away from God and neglected his laws; prophesied about the approach of divine judgment over the kingdoms of Israel and Judah and called on the listeners to repent and submit to the will of God. Stories about their deeds, sermons, prophecies, which embodied the view of history as a divine judgment, dominate the second section of the Hebrew Bible, called "Prophets". The "early prophets" tell of historical events from the death of Moses (c. 1400 BC) to the death of the kingdom of Judah in the 6th century. BC. For the most part, the historical material of these books was recorded in the 8th-7th centuries. BC, although the writing of the final parts, editing and compilation of books continued until the 5th century. BC. The Book of Joshua tells of the conquest of Canaan by Joshua in the 14th century. BC. The Book of Judges speaks of the rule of military leaders-judges - Deborah, Gideon, Samson, and others in the 13th-11th centuries. BC. The books of Samuel tell about the fate of the prophet and the last of the "judges of Israel" Samson, about the creation of the Jewish state under Saul and its rise under David in the 10th century. BC. The books of Kings describe the flowering of the kingdom under Solomon, its division into two kingdoms - Judah and Israel - after the death of Solomon, and also contain warnings expressed by the prophets Elijah and Elisha. At the end of the story it is said about the conquest of Israel by Assyria in 732-721 BC, the capture of Judah by the Babylonians in 598-587 BC. and of the beginning of the subsequent exile to Babylon. Although the books of the "early prophets" are historical, their authors do not care about objective registration of the events of the Jewish past. Their goal is to show the development of a certain religious principle: the well-being of a country can only be counted on if people and their leaders fulfill the terms of an agreement with God, and disasters and national catastrophes are divine punishment for malevolence and lawlessness. The view that God directs the history of his chosen people according to their good or evil deeds is drawn from the teachings of the prophets. Thus, the "early prophets" provide a historical background for the sermons and poetic works of the prophets themselves, which are summarized in books called "later prophets." The "later prophets" fall into two groups: "major prophets" - Jeremiah, Isaiah, Ezekiel, and 12 "minor prophets". But if you read them in chronological order, you can better understand the development of the thought of the prophets in the context of the era. According to one view, the poetic works and sermons of the prophets were preserved in oral transmission by their disciples and were written down only many years after the death of the prophets themselves. The exact dates of the compilation of these books are still a subject of controversy, and therefore all dates given are approximate. Amos (c. 751 BC) was a native of the southern kingdom of Judah, but prophesied mainly in the kingdom of Israel, in the north. A prophet of divine justice, he announced that God would destroy Israel for their social injustice and moral depravity. God requires righteous conduct, not formal observance; and his commandments apply not only to Israel and Judah, but to the whole world. Hosea (heyday of activity 745-735 BC), the only prophet from the natives of the kingdom of Israel, whose sermons have come down to our time. Like his teacher Amos, he emphasized that God loves his people even if they have stopped worshiping him. Fulfilling the command of God, he married a harlot, which symbolized the betrayal of Israel, who began to worship foreign gods. Hosea proclaimed that God suffers as a deceived husband who still loves an unfaithful wife, and that the tribulations that Israel was destined to go through would eventually bring them cleansing. Isaiah of Jerusalem (c. 740-686 BC) was, like Hosea, a disciple of Amos. He predicted (and later, while in the Kingdom of Judah, witnessed the fulfillment of his prophecy) the conquest of Israel by the Assyrians (722 BC) and the captivity of the Israelite tribes. At the same time, he announced that the "remnant" of Israel would once again turn to Yahweh and at the end of history there would be universal peace, and all mankind would be united under the rule of a descendant of King David. Isaiah was the first to express the hope of the coming of the Messiah, who later had a strong influence on both Judaism and Christianity. Similarly, his idea of ​​a "remnant" that would survive Israel's destruction set the stage for the concept of the universal purpose of the synagogue and the Christian church. Only the first 33 chapters of the Book of Isaiah can be attributed to Isaiah himself, however, some parts of these chapters are later insertions.



Micah of Moreshet (c. 700-650 BC) spoke out in defense of the oppressed poor and, like Amos, warned against magical ceremonial formalism. Zephaniah, Nahum and Habakkuk (the heyday of activity c. 626-620 BC) continued to preach in Jerusalem the will of a just God, the absolute master of history. Habakkuk deepened Isaiah's concept of faith and developed the theme of submission to the will of God without hope of material gain. Jeremiah (626-581 BC) predicted and experienced the destruction of Jerusalem and its Temple. After the first siege and deportation of the Jews (598 BC), he wrote to the captives in Babylon encouraging them and strengthening their determination to resist assimilation. After the final destruction of Jerusalem (586 BC), he proclaimed that the religion of the Jewish people would survive the destruction of the state and that God would make a "new covenant" with "the house of Israel and the house of Judah" and write it on the hearts of the people (Jer 31:31- 34). The book of the prophet Obadiah (after 586 BC) is the shortest in the Old Testament. It, in essence, is a revision of the 49th chapter of the Book of Jeremiah, which contains a prophecy about the death of the tribe of the Edomites who helped destroy Judah. Ezekiel (593-571 BC), the son of a Jerusalem priest, supported the spirit of the Jewish captives in Babylon. He developed the principle of individual (rather than national) responsibility for good and evil deeds. His vision of the new Temple (the last nine chapters of the book) formed the basis of the Jewish religion of the period after the captivity, which emphasized the fulfillment of the Law and cult prescriptions. An obscure prophet from the Babylonian captivity (c. 545 B.C.) is known as Deutero-Isaiah. To him belong the prophecies contained in ch. 40-55 Books of Isaiah. In a section called "The Song of the Suffering Servant of Yahweh," he interprets Israel's mission as a sacrifice to atone for the sins of the world and calls on the new Israel to become the light of all nations, even to the ends of the earth. Haggai (the heyday of 520 BC) and Zechariah (the heyday of 520-517 BC) preached after the Persian conquest of Babylon in 539 BC, which ended the captivity of the Jews. The Persians allowed the Jews to return to their homeland, but many chose to remain in Babylon. Haggai and Zechariah inspired those who returned to rebuild the Jerusalem Temple, the so-called. Second temple. Tritoisaiah is the name of the collection of poetic works that make up Ch. 56-66 of the Book of Isaiah, both relating to the era of the Babylonian captivity and the period immediately following it (c. 500 BC). Joel and Malachi (c. 500-450 BC) ) attempted to reform the religion and morality of the Palestinian Jews. The book of Jonah (c. 400 BC), although included in the prophetic books, is not really one. This is a text full of humor, which outlines the legend of a prophet who lived in the 8th century. BC. (mentioned in 2 Kings 14:25). Jonah, who opposed the will of God and did not want to preach to the Assyrians, was punished for this: he had to spend three days in the belly of a whale and suffer a sunstroke. The book testifies that the Jewish religion of the 4th c. BC. were universalistic ideas. The purpose of the book is to show that Yahweh cares about all people, even the hated Assyrians from Nineveh.



"Scriptures" is a colorful collection of poetic works, songs, aphorisms, historical and prophetic texts. The Psalter contains hymns and prayers, partly dating back to very ancient times. Many of them were used in the Jerusalem cult between the First and Second Temples. The final selection probably dates from the 3rd c. BC. The Book of Job (c. 575-500 BC) is a dramatic poem set within the narrative frame of a folk tale. The righteous Job, one after another, suffers misfortunes that God sends to test the strength of his faith. In a series of conversations with his friends, Job tries to figure out how suffering can fall on a righteous person. At the end of the poem, God declares that his ways are inaccessible to human understanding, and Job submits to the divine will. The central character of the book is a non-Jew, in addition, there is no mention of a contract with God on Mount Sinai. The book shows a man at a crossroads in a seemingly hostile world. The date of its creation is still debated. The Book of Proverbs (c. 950-300 BC) is a collection of aphorisms and maxims of worldly wisdom. It proposes a practical philosophy of life based primarily on success, and a morality guided by prudence and common sense. The authorship of the book is traditionally attributed to Solomon, although the collection was compiled much later on the basis of many sources. Five Scrolls ("Megillot") - books that are traditionally read on five Jewish holidays. These are Song of Songs, Ruth, Lamentations, Ecclesiastes and Esther. The Song of Songs, traditionally attributed to Solomon, is probably a collection of wedding songs from the 10th to 9th centuries. BC. It is read on the Jewish Passover when the exodus from Egypt is remembered. The Book of Ruth tells of the marriage of the wealthy landowner Boaz to the Moabite girl Ruth. Probably written between the 5th and 3rd centuries. BC, this book confirms the openness of the Jewish religion to foreigners: it says that even David had foreign ancestors. The book is read on Shavuot, or Pentecost, the spring harvest festival. The Book of Lamentations, traditionally attributed to Jeremiah, consists of five poems lamenting the destruction of Jerusalem (586 BC) and dates back to the time of the Babylonian captivity (586-536 BC). It is read on the 9th of the month of Av, on the day of fasting, when the Jews remember the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem. The book of Ecclesiastes, along with Proverbs and the Song of Songs, is traditionally attributed to Solomon, although it is more likely that all these books are by an unknown author of the 3rd c. BC. The book of Ecclesiastes is full of pessimistic reflections. This is a collection of aphorisms, the main meaning of which, unlike the Book of Proverbs, is that neither intelligence nor talent guarantees success to a person. The book of Ecclesiastes is associated with the autumn harvest festival of Sukkot. The Book of Esther tells about the Jewish wife of the historically unidentified Persian king Ahasuerus (in the Septuagint and the Synodal translation - Artaxerxes). Thanks to her courage, the Jewish community of Persia was saved from extermination, which was prepared for her by the evil vizier Haman. The book is read on the holiday of Purim, a spring holiday dedicated to the memory of this event. It was probably created in the 2nd century. BC. Chronicles (Chronicles), Ezra, Nehemiah are considered parts of a single book dating from about 250 BC. and written, apparently, by one of the scribes of the Second Temple. This book returns to the historical events of the books of Kings and contains additional material about David, Solomon, the Temple in Jerusalem, and the kings of Judah and Israel. The history of the Jews is brought up to the contemporary period of the author. The book describes the revival of the Jerusalem city community after the return from the Babylonian captivity (538-500 BC), the restoration of the walls of Jerusalem by Nehemiah (444 BC) and the legislative reforms carried out by the scribe Ezra (397 BC) . The book of Daniel (c. 165-164 BC) is probably the latest in the Old Testament. It tells about the prophet Daniel, who lived in captivity in Babylon, and about the fulfillment of his prophecy about the capture of Babylon by the Persians. The final part of the book is an apocalypse, a revelation about the near end of history and the approach of the Kingdom of God. Daniel's visions depict the major ancient eastern kingdoms of the Maccabean revolt (168-165 BC).



Apocrypha. Apocryphal in Protestantism includes some relatively late (2-1 centuries BC) biblical texts that are absent in the Jewish canon, and therefore not included in Protestant editions of the Bible. This is Susanna, Wil and the Dragon, the Song of the Three Youths, which are included, as later additions, in the Book of Daniel. The Book of Tobit is a pseudo-historical short story placed by the Greek Bible between 1-3 Books of Ezra and the Book of Judith. It tells about the salvation of the pious elder Tobit, who at first went blind and went bankrupt, but then returned to his former prosperity thanks to his son Tobius, who brought wealth, a wife and a magical remedy from a distant country, which returned his father's sight. The Book of Judith is a pseudo-historical novella, absent from the Hebrew Bible, but preserved in a Greek translation from a lost Hebrew original and in a Latin translation from a lost Aramaic version. The Greek Bible places it among the historical books, between the Book of Tobit and the Book of Esther. Probably written during the persecution of Antiochus Epiphanes (c. 175-174), it tells of a Jewish woman who, in order to save her native city of Betulia, seduces and then beheads the enemy commander Holofernes. Jerome translated it and included it in the Vulgate on the grounds that the Council of Nicaea (325) recognized this book as part of Holy Scripture. The Wisdom of Solomon and the Wisdom of Jesus Sirach contain aphorisms and practical life advice reminiscent of Proverbs of Solomon and Ecclesiastes. Baruch is a prophetic book attributed to the disciple of the prophet Jeremiah. At its end is usually placed a message attributed to Jeremiah. 1-2 The Books of Maccabees describe the struggle of the Jewish people for independence in the 2nd century. BC. (3 Maccabees was not included in the canon of the Catholic Bible). 1 The Book of Ezra is a revision of some parts of the Chronicles (in the Synodal translation: the books of Chronicles), Ezra and Nehemiah. 2 The Book of Ezra is a collection of apocalyptic visions. In the Vulgate, these books are called 3-4 Books of Ezra. The prayer of Manasseh is a prayer for forgiveness addressed to God, attributed to the king of Judah, who is in Babylonian captivity.
HISTORY OF THE OLD TESTAMENT CANON
From the time of Moses, the religion of the Jews was based on a growing body of sacred laws. The earliest of these were probably the Ten Commandments (in their original version) carved on stone tablets. Further, among the priests and prophets of Israel, the idea of ​​the canon of Scripture was gradually formed, i.e. collections of books considered sacred, unchangeable and of unquestioned authority. The first book recognized as canonical was the Book of the Law, found in the Jerusalem Temple in 621 BC, during the reign of Josiah. Apparently, it was a code of laws of Israel, hidden in the Temple by the priests, who managed to escape from the Assyrian invaders a hundred years before this event. Josiah received it as the law of Moses. Before the capture of Jerusalem by the Babylonians, only this book was recognized as sacred. This was probably the core of source D, later included in Deuteronomy. More than 200 years later, more writings were canonized. For the celebration of Tabernacles in 397 BC. (according to other sources - in 458 BC) the scribe Ezra read aloud the Book of the Law of Moses, which he brought to Jerusalem from Babylon, where it was kept in the Jewish community. This book, apparently, was the complete text of the Pentateuch, the first of three collections of books included in the Hebrew Bible, which was recognized as canonical. In the 2nd century BC. two more collections of sacred books were canonized - Prophets and Scriptures - which were read during divine services in the Temple and synagogues. The prophets appear to have been canonized c. 200 BC The Scriptures had an independent circulation, their composition and arrangement changed for a long time. Some rabbis of that time severely criticized and forbade the reading of Ecclesiastes, Esther, Song of Songs. In the apocryphal Book II of Ezra, written c. 50 AD, seven dozen books are mentioned, the status of which has not yet been established. And only ok. In 95 AD, after the destruction of the Jerusalem Temple by the Romans, a convention of rabbis in Jamnia officially drew a line under the biblical canon, approving a number of disputed books as canonical. The wisdom of Jesus Sirach was recognized as instructive, but devoid of divine inspiration. Most of the early Christians were familiar with the Old Testament from the Septuagint and often quoted from scriptures that were not included in the canon approved by the Sanhedrin of Jamnia. However, this canon was authoritative even in Christian circles, and books not included in it were shelved by local bishops or priests. Over time, they began to be called apocryphal ("hidden", "hidden"). By the 4th-5th centuries. ecclesiastical communities in the West have largely restored the authority of the Apocrypha and recommended it for reading, although some learned authorities - among them Jerome (d. 420) - have not gone so far as to include them in their list of canonical books. Under the influence of Augustine (354-430), the African councils of the late 4th c. - beginning of the 5th c. recognized the Apocrypha, but their rejection persisted for a long time. In 405, the canonicity of the Apocrypha was confirmed by Pope Innocent I. In the Roman Catholic Church, they are usually called "deuterocanonical" (forming a second, later canon). In early Protestantism, the authority of the Apocrypha was largely rejected. Martin Luther declared them to be non-canonical texts, but included most of the books in an appendix to his translation of the Bible, indicating that they were "useful and good to read." Over time, they entered most of the German, French, Spanish, Dutch and other Protestant translations of the Bible. The Apocrypha are included in the earliest editions of the King James Bible (translated from 1611) and can be found in many modern editions of the Bible. However, most Protestants view them as not entirely canonical.
Pseudepigrapha. Some biblical texts, attributed to famous biblical figures for greater authority, are usually called pseudo-epigraphs ("falsely inscribed"). These include the Odes of Solomon, the Psalms of Solomon, the Book of Enoch.
ANCIENT TRANSLATIONS OF THE BIBLE
The Old Testament was written in Hebrew (with the exception of the Aramaic parts of the books of Ezra, Nehemiah, Daniel), and already in antiquity there was a need for translations. These early translations are very important for the textual criticism of the Bible because they are older than the Masoretic Bible and in them there are readings sometimes even more reliable than in the Masoretic text.
Aramaic Targums. In the middle of the 1st millennium BC. Aramaic (Syriac) becomes the dominant spoken language throughout the Middle East. The Jews, gradually forgetting classical Hebrew, understood the sacred texts that were read in synagogues less and less. Thus arose the need for translations ("Targumim") from Hebrew into Aramaic. The oldest Targum that has come down to us is the Targum of the Book of Job, found among the Dead Sea manuscripts at Qumran. It was written around the 1st century. BC, but other surviving Targums appeared later among the Babylonian Jews who spoke Aramaic. The Targums are a paraphrase rather than a literal translation of the Bible. They bring many explanations and edifications, reflecting the spirit of their time. In many modern editions of the Hebrew Bible, the Aramaic Targum is given in parallel with the Hebrew text.
Septuagint. The Greek translation of the Hebrew Holy Scripture originated as a targum for Jews living in the Greek-speaking regions of the Middle East. Up to 3 c. BC. individual Greek translations were circulated. According to tradition, the informal nature of these translations caused discontent, and a group of 70 or 72 eminent scholars of Alexandria made an official translation for the library of King Philadelphus Ptolemy (285-247 BC). However, it is more likely that the translation that eventually became known in Latin as the Septuagint, (the Translation of the Seventy [[interpreters]]) is a collection of edited Greek oral translations recorded in the synagogues. At first, the Jews welcomed the Septuagint with approval. But with the advent of Christianity, it became associated primarily with the Christian church. Then the Jews rejected it and made new translations into Greek. In the New Testament, the Old Testament is quoted, as a rule, from the Septuagint. A great theologian and philologist Origen from Alexandria (c. 185-254) made a huge contribution to the development of biblical textual criticism and exegesis. In his monumental work Hexapla, he wrote out in six parallel columns the Hebrew original, its transcription in Greek letters, and four Greek translations: the Septuagint and versions of Aquila, Symmachus, Theodotion. Unfortunately, only a few fragments of this work have survived.
Other translations. Ancient translations of the Bible into Latin, Syriac, Ethiopian, Coptic, Arabic, Armenian, Georgian and many other languages ​​have also come down to us. Some of them are made by Jews directly from the original; Christian translations were carried out mainly from the Septuagint or other ancient translations. A number of Bible translators had to first invent an alphabet for languages ​​that did not have a written language. So it was with translations into Armenian, Georgian, Church Slavonic and a number of others. The translations were very different - from literal to completely free; thus, the learned Bishop Ulfilas, who translated the Bible for the Goths, omitted the books of Kings. He considered that they would only warm up the warlike fervor of an already aggressive people.
THE TEXT OF THE HEBREW BIBLE AND TEXTOLOGICAL PROBLEMS
The original manuscripts of the Old Testament have not come down to us. We have only relatively late copies of the Hebrew Bible and ancient translations. The Hebrew text is the fruit of the activity of many generations of scribes; it was often changed and distorted. Since many errors crept into the manuscript, the task of Old Testament textual criticism is to accurately restore those words that were recorded at the earliest stage of written fixation.
Texts of the scribes (sopherim). For several centuries, the text of the Old Testament, apparently, was not rigidly fixed. The scribes of the early period (c. 500 BC - 100 AD), who are called "early scribes (soferim)", distorted the text: they made mistakes when copying, hearing a particular word incorrectly, reading or by writing it. There were spelling errors; words, lines or whole phrases were skipped, repeated or rearranged; words incomprehensible or offensive were "corrected"; inserts were made with editorial explanations and conclusions; different readings of the same text were given in succession; marginal notes were later taken as part of the original text and inserted in the wrong places. All this has led to an extraordinary variety of options. However, in Roman times, the so-called. "later scribes" begin to attempt to unify the text of Scripture. Thus, under the leadership of Rabbi Akiba (c. 50-132), attempts were made to restore the original text of the Bible; these were the first steps in textual criticism. Nevertheless, even during this period, minor changes to the text were allowed. Eighteen corrections (they are called "corrections of the scribes") touched upon words that in pious circles were considered erroneous or blasphemous. So, for example, in Hab 1:12 it was said: "O Yahweh ... You will not die" (in Hebrew - "lo tamut"). But this thought could sow doubts about the eternity of the Creator, and therefore one letter was changed, and the text became this: "We will not die" (in Hebrew "lo namut").
Masoretic Bible. In the period from the 5th c. up to 11-12 centuries. the scribes (soferim) were replaced by scholars who were called masoretes (baale-hammasorah, keepers of tradition). The text developed by the largest of the Masorites, Aaron ben Asher, formed the basis of the modern Hebrew Bible. The Masoretes avoided directly interfering with the Hebrew text of the Bible, which was considered sacred at the time, so any change was unthinkable. Instead, they collected thousands of marginalia (marginal notes) from numerous manuscripts and incorporated them into the text. Marginalia such as "kere" ("read") are so rooted in tradition that during the synagogue reading of the Bible, they were guided precisely by them, and not by the version that was in the handwritten text ("ketiv"). For example, the original Job 13:5 reads: "Behold, he (God) kills me, and I have no hope," but the Masoretes instead of "no" ordered to read "in him", and as a result it turned out: "Behold, he is kills me, but in him is my hope." The Masoretes made some important improvements in the recording of biblical texts. Hebrew writing only denoted consonants, but the Masoretes developed a system of diacritics to represent vowels. Now they could change the vocalization in the word they wanted to correct. For example, they provided the tetragram JHWH with vowel signs for the substitute word Adonai (Lord). Some Christian readers, unfamiliar with the practice of adding the vowels of one word to the consonants of another, have misread the name of God as Jehovah. There was also no punctuation in the text of the scribes. Intonation pauses or the end of a sentence were judged only by guesswork, which also gave rise to the possibility of misunderstanding. The oral tradition of the cantillation, or psalmody, was useful in indicating the correct phrasing and stress in the words of a text, but there was always the danger that the tradition would break down and not be passed on to the next generation. This is why the Masoretes developed a system of accents, small marks, similar to vowel marks, placed above or below words in text. Each of these accents, which are still printed in all modern editions of the Hebrew Bible, means a certain melodic figure, a motive consisting of one or more notes. In addition, the accent performs syntactic and phonetic functions: it divides the sentence into semantic parts by caesura and helps to establish semantic connections between the individual words of this sentence, and also highlights the stressed syllable in the word. There were several Masoretic schools with different approaches to vocalization, punctuation and "correction" of texts. Two of them, the most famous, are the schools of Moshe ben-Naftali and Aharon ben-Assher (both from the Palestinian Tiberias). The text of ben Asher became generally accepted and was followed, for example, by the famous Jewish philosopher Maimonides (1135-1204). However, in the early printed Hebrew Bible, prepared by Jacob ben Chayim and published in Venice by D. Bomberg (1524-1525), later, mixed manuscripts were used. And only in 1937 did R. Kittel's critical edition appear, based on the authoritative text of ben Asher. Textology of the Hebrew Bible from the Renaissance to the 20th century. During the Renaissance and Reformation, an uncritical enthusiasm for the authenticity of the Masoretic text reigned for some time. Some scientists of the 16th-17th centuries. it has even been claimed that the Masoretic vowel is divinely inspired and sacred. Eventually more cautious scholars came to the conclusion that the texts of the Masoretic Bible were not exact lists from the originals, and made a detailed study of the ancient translations. At the same time, knowledge of the Hebrew language began to improve due to acquaintance with Arabic and other Semitic languages. Textological methods underwent further development during the 19th and early 20th centuries. In recent years, the discovery of new manuscripts and progress in the study of the Hebrew language have made it possible to better understand the Hebrew Bible. Significant progress has been made in the study of the Septuagint and other ancient translations. Thanks to the discovery of the Dead Sea manuscripts at Khirbet Qumran (1947), it became clear that between the 1st century. BC. and 1 in. AD there were at least several editions of the biblical text. It also turned out that the Qumran manuscripts often show a closer affinity to the Septuagint than to the Masoretic text.
HISTORICAL-CRITICAL METHOD
In the 17-18 centuries. scholars began to study the Bible, proceeding not from theological, but from historical and critical considerations. Philosophers T. Hobbes and B. Spinoza questioned the authorship of Moses in relation to the Pentateuch and pointed out a number of chronological inconsistencies that arise in the literal interpretation of the Book of Genesis. The French scientist J. Astruc (1684-1766) put forward a hypothesis that the Book of Genesis belonged to two authors (Yahvist and Elohist). Considering that Moses was the author of the Pentateuch, Astruc assumed that Moses used some additional sources in his work. J. Eichhorn in his work Introduction to the Old Testament (1780-1783) for the first time distinguished between the documentary sources of the Pentateuch - J, E, P and D. Not all of Eichhorn's assumptions were subsequently confirmed, but in general his approach turned out to be fruitful, and at present he is considered father of the historical-critical approach to the Old Testament. In the 1870s and 1880s, the documentary hypothesis acquired its classical form in the works of the greatest biblical scholar of that time, J. Wellhausen. In his work, Wellhausen did not limit himself to studying the sources of the Pentateuch, but tried to reconstruct the religious history of Israel in the light of Hegel's philosophy of history. He disregarded the history of the Jews recorded in the Bible before King David as legendary, ignored the person of Moses and the monotheistic ideas contained in the early sources J and E, so that the religion of the Hebrew tribes in his exposition appeared as polytheistic. He believed that in contrast to this polytheism, the prophets put forward the idea of ​​God, one for the entire universe. The opposition of these two points of view disappeared in the Jewish religion in the era after the Babylonian captivity, when the ritualism and legalism of the Jerusalem priests and the humanism of the people who compiled such books as Proverbs and Ecclesiastes won. This view has not stood the test of time. Archaeological research has shown that many elements of the religious cult, which Wellhausen attributed to the era after the captivity, are of an older origin, such as details of sacrifices and details of the design of the tabernacle of the covenant. Nevertheless, despite its shortcomings, the Wellhausen school generated an unprecedented interest in the prophets, whose contribution to the religious beliefs of Jews and Christians is universally recognized. With the development of Near Eastern archeology, the study of the Old Testament has become a special field of study in the Near East. Archaeologists have unearthed the highly advanced civilizations that the ancient Jews lived among, and have convincingly confirmed biblical stories that had been discarded as legends a century earlier. The discovery of many thousands of literary texts and inscriptions throughout the Middle East allowed Old Testament scholars to realize even more clearly the relationship of the Hebrew religion with the cults of neighboring peoples, as well as to emphasize its individuality. Growing attention is paid to the fundamental unity of the theological concepts expressed in the Old Testament, the role of worship in the formation and formulation of religious ideas, the significance of the covenant union God made with His people.
NEW TESTAMENT
God, through the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, gave people salvation - this is the main teaching of Christianity. While only the first four books of the New Testament deal directly with the life of Jesus, each of the 27 books seeks in its own way to interpret the meaning of Jesus or show how his teachings apply to the lives of believers.
BOOKS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT
The New Testament begins with four stories about the life and teachings of Jesus Christ: the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. The Acts of the Apostles tells about the founding of the Christian church and the missionary work of the apostles. Acts is followed by 21 epistles, a collection of letters attributed to various apostles who instructed Christian communities and individual believers in matters of doctrine, morality, and the organization of their lives. The last book of the New Testament - Revelation, or Apocalypse - is dedicated to the vision of the coming end of the world and the final triumph of good over evil.
Gospels. Synoptic Gospels: Matthew, Mark, Luke. The first three gospels are often referred to as the synoptic gospels (Greek synopsis - joint review), because they talk about the same events related to Jesus, and cite the same sayings of him, often coinciding verbatim. The well-known stories about the birth of Jesus, about most of the miracles he performed, and all his parables are contained in the synoptic gospels, but not in the Gospel of John. The synoptic gospels differ mainly in the point of view of each, reflecting the views not only of the evangelists, but also of the Christians for whom they were written. The authorship of the first gospel is traditionally attributed to Matthew, a tax collector (collector) who became one of the first disciples of Jesus. Many, however, doubt the authorship of Matthew. It is clear that the author was Jewish and wrote for Jewish-Christian readers. In Jesus, the author sees first of all the fulfillment and embodiment of what is written in the Jewish Scriptures, he constantly repeats that the most important deeds and words of Jesus were already foretold in the Scriptures of the Jews. Matthew is the longest gospel, it contains the most complete sayings of Jesus, especially in ch. 5-7 (the so-called Sermon on the Mount). More than other gospels, Matt pays attention to the Christian church and Jesus as its founder. The Gospel of Matthew is an account of the life and teachings of Christ, which is readily read and often quoted. In the gospels of Mark and Luke, there is a closeness to the environment of the Gentiles, this is manifested both in the language and in the depicted setting. Jesus in Matthew is the one in whom the ancient prophecies were fulfilled, and for Mark he is a miracle worker. The gospel of Mark seeks to show that Jesus' messianism was hidden during his earthly life, and for this reason he was accepted by a few and without due enthusiasm. The Gospel of Luke contains much material not found in other stories about the life of Jesus, giving lengthy versions of the stories about his birth, suffering and death, about his appearances to the disciples after the resurrection. The life of Jesus is seen as a turning point in world history: the era of Israel is replaced by the era of the universal church. More than other gospels, it portrays Jesus as a friend to the poor and outcast. Most scholars agree that the similarity of the synoptic gospels is due to the fact that the authors used the common material of the tradition, and that they borrowed some materials from each other. But in questions of who borrowed from whom, who is the author of the gospels and when they were written, researchers do not agree. According to the main theory, called the "Four Document Hypothesis" (in German scientific circles the name "Two Source Hypothesis" is accepted), the earliest of the gospels and the first of the four documents is the Gospel of Mark. It is believed that Mark is the source for both Matthew and Luke, since both contain almost all of the material of the Gospel of Mark, although parts of this text are in a different order and somewhat changed. Further, Mt and Lk give a large number of sayings of Jesus common to them, which are not in Mk. They are supposed to be taken from a second document that has not come down to us, which is often denoted by the letter Q (from the German word Quelle, "source"). Finally, both Mt and Lk have their own materials. Nevertheless, some conservative scholars continue to insist on the primacy of the Gospel of Matthew. As proof of this, they cite an ancient tradition according to which Matthew wrote the very first gospel in Aramaic, later translated into Greek. In dating the synoptic gospels, scholars rely mainly on "internal evidence." A good example is the conclusions of many researchers based on the analysis of three versions of Jesus' saying about the destruction of the Jerusalem Temple, which is adjacent to the apocalyptic prophecy about the end of the world and the second coming of Christ (Mk 13; Mt 24-25, Lk 19:41-44 and 21: 5-36). Mark is believed to have written his version during the Jewish National Revolt of 66-70 AD, but before the fall of the city and the destruction of the Temple by the Romans in 70 AD. Luke, on the other hand, demonstrates knowledge of some details of the Roman siege of Jerusalem, which means that this gospel was written later. Matthew seems to have written his book after this event, and besides, his narrative suggests a higher level of development of the Christian church than in the text of the Gospel of Mark. Therefore, Mt and Luk date back to ca. 80-85 AD



Gospel of John. The fourth gospel, the Gospel of John, differs from the synoptics in its focus, material used, and composition. In addition, it paints a portrait of Jesus in significantly different colors than the synoptic gospels. The author is not driven simply by narrative or biographical interest; the main thing for him is to state the only religious idea: Jesus is the Word of God made flesh. The first part of the gospel tells about a series of miracles performed by Jesus, with an explanation of their spiritual meaning, which Jesus himself gives. The concluding part contains a series of conversations Jesus had with his disciples at the Last Supper. In signs and discourses, the true nature of Jesus and his role as the bearer of divine Revelation become clear. One of the church fathers, Clement of Alexandria, wrote: "After the other evangelists recorded the facts of history, John wrote the spiritual gospel." Most researchers agree that the fourth gospel was written not by the apostle John, but perhaps by one of John's assistants or disciples and was apparently created at the end of the 1st century.
Acts of the Apostles. Luke is generally accepted as the author of the Acts of the Apostles. The first half of the book traces the early history of the Christian community led by Peter. The second tells of Paul's missionary activities from the time of his conversion to Christianity until his imprisonment in Rome. The Acts of the Apostles - the second volume of Luke's work - was written shortly after his gospel. This is the first attempt by a Christian author to write a history of the church.
The Epistles of the Apostles. The corpus of 21 epistles, placed in the New Testament after Acts, is attributed to the apostle Paul and the disciples of Jesus - James, Peter, John and Jude. At present, however, the traditional authorship and dating of the epistles are the subject of scholarly debate.
The Epistles of the Apostle Paul. The traditional headings of the 14 epistles attributed to Paul contain the names of communities or the names of the people to whom they were addressed. In the Bible, messages to communities are printed before messages to certain individuals, and within each group they are arranged in order of their size, the most lengthy at the beginning. Most scholars agree that Romans, 1-2 Corinthians, Galatians, Philippians, 1 Thessalonians, and Philemon are authentic. It is very likely that Paul also wrote Colossians, while his authorship of 2 Thessalonians and Ephesians is doubtful. Many scholars believe that 1-2 Timothy and Titus were not written by Paul. And practically no one today will argue for Paul's authorship of Hebrews. Paul wrote his epistles after 50, and he died in the 60s. The chronology of his epistles has not been definitively established, but he probably began with 1 Thess, the oldest document of the Christian church. The four great epistles - Gal, 1-2 Cor, Rome - may have been written after him, and the epistles of Phlp and Phlm were the last. If Paul was the author of 2 Thess, then it was probably written shortly after 1 Thess; if he wrote the message Kol, then it appeared at about the same time as the message Flm. The central point of Paul's teaching can be formulated as follows: salvation is available to the entire human race - both Gentiles and Jews - through faith in Jesus Christ. 1 Thess assures the congregation that at the second coming of Christ both dead and living Christians will be with God; it ends with a series of instructions on the duties of Christians in life. 2 Thes advises not to be impatient while waiting for the second coming. In Galatians, Paul begins by defending his authority as an apostle and gives some interesting autobiographical details. He then argues that salvation requires primarily faith in Jesus Christ, not the observance of the Jewish Law. 1 Corinthians contains Paul's admonitions on dissension, immorality, conversion of Christians to pagan courts, marriage, idolatry, and the like, issues that troubled this most dysfunctional of the communities he founded. The epistle contains a majestic hymn of love (ch. 13) and a discourse on immortality (ch. 15). 1 Cor, like Gal, provides evidence for Paul's claim to the apostolate. Romans is the most complete exposition of Paul's theology. In it he considers the problem of the relationship between Jewish and Gentile Christians in the context of a detailed discussion of the problem of sin and salvation. The letter to the Colossians warns against the delusion that combines the desire to become like angels with the performance of Jewish religious rites. Flm is a private letter to a friend asking him to forgive a runaway slave. Philp is a friendly letter to the community in Philippi with an expression of love, joy for them and gratitude for the donations sent. Ephesians rather dryly sums up the issues that Paul has already touched on. It lacks the immediacy and emotionality of other Pauline letters. Traditionally, it is considered together with Flp, Kol and Flm as one of the so-called. the epistles of bonds written at the end of Paul's life. The "pastoral epistles" (so called 1-2 Tim) form a special group. Their style and content differ significantly from the style and content of other letters of Paul. They reflect a later stage in the development of the Christian Church and were written, apparently, at the end of the 1st century. The Epistle to the Hebrews is wrongly placed in the corpus of the Pauline epistles. This is a lengthy sermon, sustained in good rhetorical traditions, distinguished by smoothness of style and eloquence. It argues that the death of Jesus is the perfect sacrifice that abolished the sacrificial system that existed in the Jewish religion. Researchers agree that the Apostle Paul could not be its author, and date it to 60-80 years.
Other messages. The last seven epistles are called "catholic" ("catholic"). This name suggests that they are addressed to the "universal" church, and not to an individual or a separate community. Unlike the Pauline epistles, their titles contain the names of the authors. The Epistle of James is a moralistic treatise in the tradition of Jewish "literature of the wise." The author argues with Paul's point of view (or rather, with its radical interpretations) that salvation can only be achieved by faith, and argues that faith must be supported by pious deeds. If its author was indeed James of Jerusalem (brother of the Lord), then it was written before 62 (the year of Jacob's death). However, a significant number of researchers attribute it to the end of the first century. 1 Peter also deals with moral issues and encourages believers to humbly endure persecution. If the author of the epistle is Peter, then the persecution in question may be that of Nero in the 60s; if the author lived in a later period, then the persecution of Domitian in the 90s is meant. 2 Peter warns against false teachers and states that the Day of Judgment has been postponed for a while to give people an opportunity to repent. Most scholars doubt the authorship of Peter and attribute the document to the first half of the 2nd century BC. In this case, this epistle is the latest book of the New Testament. 1 The epistle of John is traditionally attributed to the author of the fourth gospel (regardless of whether it was the apostle John or someone else). It contains the teachings of the Fourth Gospel. There is less agreement in academia over the authorship of Ying 2-3, which are short notes; it is possible that they were written towards the end of the author's life. All three epistles probably belong to the end of the 1st century. The Epistle of Jude, the last in the corpus, appeals to believers to avoid heresies and return to orthodoxy. Perhaps it was written at the end of the 1st c.
Revelation of John the Evangelist. Revelation (Apocalypse), the last book in the Bible, continues the tradition of Jewish apocalypses. The author, in vivid symbolic visions, paints pictures of the struggle between good and evil; the culmination of this battle is the defeat of the forces of evil, the resurrection of the dead and the second coming of Jesus, who judges at the end of the world. The book is traditionally attributed to the apostle John, but stylistic differences between the Apocalypse, the Gospel, and the Epistles of John lead scholars to doubt that they were written by the same hand. The book apparently dates back to the reign of the emperor Domitian (81-96). She had the greatest influence on the Pentecostal and Adventist Protestant churches.
NEW TESTAMENT CANON
"Canon" refers to scriptures that are held to be the highest authority. In the 1st century such a holy scripture for Christians was the Hebrew Bible. The books of the New Testament were created gradually, and acquired canonical status much later. By the middle of the 2nd c. many Christian works passed around. In addition to the texts that were eventually included in the canon, there were many other gospels, deeds, epistles and apocalypses, now called the New Testament Apocrypha. Some of them, such as the Gospel of Peter, contain the core of an authentic tradition. Others, such as the Gospel of the Infancy of Thomas, are folk tales and legends designed to satisfy popular curiosity and fill in gaps in Jesus' lives. Another group of writings, such as a collection of texts discovered in the 20th century. near the Egyptian town of Nag Hammadi, is of a Gnostic nature and has been condemned as heretical. One group of books, written shortly after the age of the apostles, was held in special esteem and for a time was regarded almost as sacred writing. Their authors are called "apostolic men". The epistles of Ignatius of Antioch give an idea of ​​the church organization at the beginning of the second century; they preach the ideal of martyrdom. In the First Epistle of Clement, one of the first bishops of Rome, a protest is made against the removal of some of the leaders of the Corinthian church. The Second Epistle of Clement is a sermon on the Christian life and repentance. The Shepherd of Hermas is a moralistic treatise, riddled with cryptic symbolism, and the Epistle of Barnabas is somewhat reminiscent of the Epistle to the Hebrews, but is more allegorical. The Didache (Teaching of the Twelve Apostles), in addition to moralistic arguments about the "two ways" of life and death, contains a number of instructions on the celebration of church sacraments, on church organization and discipline. By the end of the 2nd c. some Christian religious books clearly acquire a canonical status: for example, from the writings of the early Christian apologist Justin Martyr, we know that Christians read "memoirs of the apostles" before the celebration of the Sunday Eucharist. Most lists of Christian books from this period include the four gospels, all of the Pauline epistles (with the exception of Hebrews), and the First Epistles of Peter and John. Other books, and above all Revelation and the Epistle to the Hebrews, were rejected, while many writings of the "apostolic men" were considered divinely inspired. There were at least two criteria for inclusion in the lists of authoritative Christian books: apostolic authorship and widespread use in a particular local church. Over time, a line was drawn under the canon. In the 2nd century Marcion, head of a heretical sect in Asia Minor, compiled his own canon of Holy Scripture. There was no place in it for the entire Old Testament, and of all Christian texts, the abridged version of the Gospel of Luke and a heavily edited selection of Paul's epistles were included in this list. Marcion's activity seems to have prompted the church to draw up its own canon in order to protect itself from heretical writings and to prevent the penetration of heretical false teachings into already recognized books. In the end, the main criterion for inclusion in the New Testament canon was the authorship of the apostles. The first list of authoritative books, which is completely identical to the content of our New Testament, was compiled by St. Athanasius in 367.
TEXTS, TRANSLATIONS AND TEXTOLOGICAL PROBLEMS
Greek text. Several papyrus fragments found in Egypt are the oldest New Testament manuscripts to date. The earliest of these, a passage from John 18 (Jesus before Pilate), was written c. 110. About 150-200 there are two larger fragments: one from the Epistle to Titus, the other from the Gospel of Matthew. The oldest papyri containing sufficient text for attribution were written c. 200-250. One of them contains part of the Gospel of John, the other contains passages from all four gospels and the Acts of the Apostles, and the third contains passages from Paul's epistles. In total, more than 70 papyrus fragments have come down to us, on which almost half of the text of the New Testament is written. In the 4th c. papyrus began to give way to more durable parchment. Two almost complete Greek copies of the Bible date from this century: the Vatican Codex (Codex Vaticanus), stored in the Vatican Library, and the Codex Sinaiticus, accidentally discovered in a Greek monastery at the foot of Mount Sinai, in a basket for old manuscripts to be burned. After the 4th c. the number of Greek manuscripts is increasing. To date, more than 5,000 manuscripts are known. The first printed edition of the Greek New Testament, called the Complutensian Bible (Biblia Complutensis), appeared in 1514. However, it did not circulate until 1516, when the Greek New Testament was published under the editorship of the humanist scholar Erasmus of Rotterdam. His text was hastily prepared, using late and often unreliable manuscripts. In some places, Erasmus corrected the Greek text, coordinating it with the text of the Vulgate. Nevertheless, his text formed the basis of many later editions of the Greek New Testament, and it was from it that the early Protestant Reformers made their translations. From 1546 to 1551, the Parisian printer Robert Estienne (Stefanus) produced 4 editions of the Greek New Testament, containing the text of Erasmus with marginal readings taken from the Complutensian Bible and other sources. His 1551 edition provided the basis for later English translations, including the King James Version.
ancient translations. Early translations of the New Testament date back to the 2nd century. The first Latin translations appeared probably in North Africa. Soon they compiled an authoritative translation (the so-called Itala Vetus, Itala Vetus), which by the time of Jerome had an almost canonical status. At the end of the 4th c. Jerome revised and significantly corrected the Itala, thus creating his own translation, the Vulgate. In the East, the New Testament books were translated in the 2nd century. into Syriac. Like the Old Latin translations, they were unified at the end of the 4th century. The standard translation was called the Peshitta, or "common" translation. It remains the official text of the Jacobite and Nestorian churches. It contains 22 of the 27 recognized books, not including 2 Peter, 2 and 3 John, Jude, and Revelation. Other ancient translations, in whole or in fragments, have come down to us in Arabic, Armenian, Georgian, Ethiopian, Nubian, Gothic, Old Church Slavonic, and six dialects of the Coptic language.
Textology, or text criticism. The task of textual critics is to establish with maximum reliability the original version of a particular text. In the case of a book as ancient as the New Testament, textual scholars study the various readings (variants) in the manuscripts to determine which one is most likely to be the original version and which one can be discarded. Textual scholars have at their disposal an impressive amount of material: papyri, more than 5,000 Greek manuscripts, 10,000 manuscripts of ancient translations, and 80,000 New Testament quotations in the writings of the church fathers. No one knows how many different variants of the same phrase they contain. Over 30,000 different readings were recorded in a survey of 150 manuscripts of the Gospel of Luke. In establishing the most likely original reading of a New Testament passage, textual scholars follow certain standard rules. The general rule is that the older the manuscript, the more likely it is to follow the original. However, this rule can be misleading, as late manuscripts of one family often retain correct readings that were corrupted in earlier manuscripts of another family. Simple misspellings of scribes are easy to detect - often they are associated with memory errors (for example, a scribe could accidentally insert a reading from one gospel into another). Often, however, the scribe deliberately altered the text, either to correct or improve it, or to bring it into line with his theological views. So, suspicious places in the text should be checked for compliance with their style and the concept of the work as a whole. Shorter readings are generally preferred over longer ones, which may contain later additions. Readings in overly regular or slick Greek are often discarded because the authors of the New Testament books used everyday language that was far removed from classical literary Greek. For the same reason, of the two readings, the more difficult to understand is often chosen, since the other may be the result of an editorial simplification by the scribe. Although the preference for one or the other often depends on the taste and intuition of the researcher, there is no doubt that today we have the Greek text of the New Testament, which is much closer to the original than the text that worked with the scientists who stood at the origins of critical research and relied on for the edition of Erasmus. So, for example, 1 John 5:7-8 in the Synodal translation reads as follows: "For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. And three testify on earth: spirit, water and blood; and these three are one. The words in italics are missing from the original text. The dubious passage goes back to Latin manuscripts made in Spain or North Africa, possibly in the 4th century. It is missing from all Greek manuscripts made before 1400, and is omitted in modern critical editions of the New Testament.
HISTORICAL AND CRITICAL RESEARCH METHODS
The historical-critical approach to the study of the New Testament - an attempt to understand the text in the context of the historical circumstances of its occurrence and taking into account the literary forms and genres that its authors resorted to - has often caused controversy. Much of the historical-critical approach was due to the desire to reconstruct the true teachings of Jesus and the early Christian community. The researchers leaned towards two extreme positions. Some critics saw Jesus as a preacher of a pure and simple message about the universal brotherhood of man and universal love, and believed that this message was distorted by the introduction of other elements: teachings about the relationship of Christ to God, prophecies about the imminent end of the world, myths, as well as borrowings from popular religious cults. The task of criticism was to purge Christianity of these alien elements and restore the original teaching of Jesus. Other scholars have emphasized that the theological elements in the New Testament are not necessarily foreign; many of them were already present in the very teaching of Jesus. According to this view, the New Testament is a presentation of the Christian message in terms understandable to a person who lived in the 1st century. The figure of the "historical Jesus", whose teachings were thought to be at odds with those of the religion that had formed under his name, first appeared in the work of G.S. Reimarus (1694-1768). Reimarus was a deist, i.e. believed in God, who can be comprehended by reason alone and manifests his power in the immutable laws of nature. Rejecting miracles and Revelation, Reimarus tried to separate the historical Jesus from the figure of Christ, the suffering Redeemer of mankind; such an idea of ​​Christ, Reimarus believed, arose among the apostles after the death of Jesus. D. F. Strauss returned to the question of the historical Jesus in The Life of Jesus (1835-1836). Strauss insisted on a fundamental difference between what he called the "inner core" of the Christian faith (which he traced back to Jesus himself) and the "myths," the miraculous and supernatural elements that were introduced into the image of Jesus and his teachings. FK Baur (1792-1860) focused on the history of the early Christian community. Influenced by the philosophy of G. W. F. Hegel, he viewed the history of the early church as a struggle between two currents - adherents of the observance of the Jewish Law (Petrinists) and Christianity free from the Law (Paulinists), which led to the emergence of "early Catholicism" (i.e. to the formation of the church with its hierarchy, cult and fixed doctrine). Perhaps the most popular result of the historical-critical studies of the 19th century. was the work of E. Renan "The Life of Jesus". In the second half of the 19th century. scholars have been concerned with what we can learn from the gospels about the "real" Jesus. Studies of this period have usually taken the form of a comparison between Paul's Christological conception and the simpler reconstructed image of the historical Jesus. So, for A. von Harnack (1851-1930), Jesus was first of all a rabbi who interpreted the Jewish religion in his own way, emphasizing that God is the Father of all people, which means that all people are brothers. At the beginning of the 20th century there was a strong backlash against the concept of "liberal Jesus" (i.e. the image of Jesus in liberal theology). This rejection was expressed by A. Schweitzer in From Reimarus to Wrede (1906; the second edition was published under the title History of the Study of the Life of Jesus, 1913). Schweitzer and his associates believed that the "liberal" image of Jesus ignored the world around him in which Jesus lived and taught; indeed, liberal theologians simply cleared the biblical image of Jesus of those elements that contradicted the ideals of the 19th century, declaring them to be later interpolations. Schweitzer proved that many of these elements were already present in pre-Christian Judaism. In particular, he singled out the ideas present in pre-Christian Judaism about the end of the world, about the coming of God or his Messiah, about the judgment of the world and about the beginning of a new age, in which the Dominion of God will be established. Other researchers have looked for external influences that would allow the history of the Christian movement to be explained without resorting to an analysis of Judaism. Focusing on the pagan cults of New Testament times, they revealed their similarities with the religious practices of the early Christians. In particular, it has been argued that the Eucharist is reminiscent of the ritual meals of the mystery cults of Dionysus, Attis, and Mithras. Some scholars, following the tradition of the liberal school, have noted the radical change which the Christian religion underwent in the passage from Jesus to Paul; others, discovering the influence of pagan rituals on the outer side of early Christianity, insisted on the unique originality of its content. J. Wellhausen founded in his time a "radical school" of historical criticism, which distinguished between the historical Jesus, who had no messianic claims, and the post-Easter community, which proclaimed him Messiah and Lord. In line with this approach, a concept was developed according to which the gospel narratives were not the foundation of the early Christian community, but its product. In 1919 C. L. Schmidt suggested that the Gospel of Mark, which forms the backbone of the gospels of Matthew and Luke, was a collection of church narratives that had previously circulated independently. The study of this oral, pre-literary stage of the gospels led to the emergence of an influential and controversial school of form analysis (Formgeschichte), led by M. Dibelius (1883-1947) and R. Bultmann (1884-1976). In the form-analytical method, clearly defined content units of the text, called forms, are distinguished from the material of the gospels, which gradually crystallized in the oral tradition until the moment of their written fixation in the gospels. These forms include miracle stories, sayings of Jesus and parables, myths and legends about the birth of Jesus and his life, brief scenes from the life of Jesus, ending with a laconic saying like the famous "to Caesar, Caesar's." While pointing out the similarities of some gospel passages with folklore, many form-analysts question the historicity of some gospel stories, such as the miracle stories that followed Jesus' death on the cross. After the First World War, historical-critical studies increasingly focused on the thought forms of the New Testament - on the main ideas of the proclamation of Jesus. It has been argued that many of the thought forms in which the teachings of Jesus are expressed do not make sense to modern man. Thus, the idea of ​​the end of the world or the second coming of the Messiah on a cloud does not correspond to modern experience. However, the fact that in the 20 conservative and fundamentalist Protestant denominations have survived and continue to emerge, testifies to the enormous gap between the views of professional critics and many believers who read the Bible. In order to overcome this gap, the method of researching the history of editions (Redaktionsgeschichte), which has been successfully developed since the middle of the 20th century, can be useful. Whereas form-analysts such as Bultmann focused on classifying certain formal elements in a text and determining the place and role of these elements in the life of the church before they were written down, revision history researchers tried to figure out how these elements were brought together and used by the real authors of the New Testament.
BIBLE TRANSLATIONS INTO ENGLISH
The history of translations of the Bible into English falls into two periods: the Middle Ages and the Modern Age.
Middle Ages.
Old English period.
From the 7th century, when the Anglo-Saxons were converted to Christianity, until the Reformation, the only Bible that was considered authoritative in Britain was the Vulgate. The earliest attempts to translate the Bible into Anglo-Saxon cannot, strictly speaking, be called translations. These were loose verse retellings of well-known biblical stories. One ancient manuscript contains poems formerly attributed to the monk and poet Caedmon of Whitby (flourished c. 670), but now attributed to the 9th or early 10th century. Another corpus of rhythmic paraphrases is attributed to Cynewulf, who lived approximately in the same era as Caedmon. The first attempts at a true translation of the Bible were made in the 8th century. Bishop Aldhelm of Sherborne (d. 709) - probably the author of the translation of the Psalter. Bede the Venerable (673-735) translated the Lord's Prayer and part of the Gospel of John. King Alfred (849-899) translated the Ten Commandments and a number of other biblical texts. The manuscript known as the Vespasian Psalter, written c. 825, contains the earliest example of a particular type of translation called "glossa". The glosses were supposed to serve as an aid to the clergy and fit between the lines of the Latin text. They often followed the Latin word order, which was quite different from the Anglo-Saxon word order. Around 950, one gloss was inserted into a lavishly illuminated manuscript (the so-called Lindisfarne Gospels), the Latin text of which was written ca. 700. Soon after this, similar glosses began to be inscribed in other manuscripts. By the end of the 10th c. There have already been many translations. The West Saxon Gospels (10th century) are a complete translation of the gospels, possibly by three translators. Around 990, Elfric, famous for his learning, translated several books of the Old Testament, including the entire Pentateuch, the books of Joshua, Judges, Kings, and several books from the Old Testament apocrypha. His translations, often strayed into prose retelling, he often inserted into sermons. Ælfric's work, the West Saxon Gospels, and numerous translations of the Psalter are all that was done in the Old English period towards a complete translation of the Bible. After Ælfric, Bible translations were no longer made: Britain plunged into the "dark ages" of the Norman conquests.
Middle English period. In a calmer 13th c. translation activity resumed. Many new translations of the Bible into English fall under the category of devotional literature rather than actual translation; for example, the Ormulum of the monk Ormes (c. 1215) is a rhythmic translation of gospel passages used in mass in combination with sermons. Around 1250, a rhymed retelling of the books of Genesis and Exodus appeared. Three translations of the Psalter appeared c. 1350: An anonymous verse translation, a translation of the Psalter attributed to William of Shoreham, and a translation with commentary by the hermit and mystic Richard Rolle of Gempol. In the 13th-14th centuries. various parts of the New Testament were translated by unknown authors.
Wycliffe Bible. By the end of the 14th century The first complete translation of the Bible into English appeared. It was the Wycliffe Bible, a translation initiated and directed by John Wycliffe (c. 1330-1384). Wycliffe insisted that the gospel is the rule of life and that all people have the right to read it "in the dialect in which they know best the teaching of Christ." He insisted that the Bible in English was needed to spread this teaching. The Wycliffe Bible is almost certainly not translated by Wycliffe himself, but by his collaborators. There are two versions of the translation. The first was begun by Nicholas of Hereford, one of Wycliffe's followers, and completed by another hand c. 1385. A later and less ponderous translation was probably made by another follower of Wycliffe, John Perway (c. 1395). After Wycliffe's death, his views were condemned and the reading of his Bible banned. Because of Wycliffe's unorthodox teachings and the intransigence of his supporters, the vernacular Bible became associated in orthodox minds with heresy. Although translations of the Bible were also undertaken in other European countries, in England, before the Reformation, no one undertook translations of the Bible. Despite the ecclesiastical curse, the Wycliffe Bible was often copied, and some parts of it were later borrowed by William Tyndale, the first of the reformed translators. Protestant translations: from Tyndale to the New English Bible. The Protestant translators of the Reformation abandoned the Vulgate as their primary source. In the course of comparing the Hebrew and Greek texts of the Bible with the Latin text of the Vulgate, inconsistencies and inaccuracies were discovered. In addition, reformist translators who had broken with the Roman Catholic Church were unwilling to base their translations on the Latin Bible.
Tyndall. The first English Protestant translator of the Bible was William Tyndale (c. 1490-1536). Tyndall studied Greek at Oxford and Cambridge, and Hebrew, presumably in Germany. He attempted to have his translation of the New Testament printed in Cologne, but the church authorities forced him to move to Worms, where he completed the edition. A large format edition was published at Worms in 1525; it came to England the following year and was immediately burned. Despite the church curse, reprints followed one after another, many came to England from the Netherlands. The first volume of the Old Testament in Tyndall's translation appeared in 1530; Tindal was arrested, in prison he continued to work on the Old Testament, but in 1536, as a heretic, he was burned at the stake in Vilvoorde near Brussels. The rejection of Tyndall's translation was mainly due to its purely Protestant tone. Although King Henry VIII broke with Rome in the early 1530s, he was not at all sympathetic to Tyndall's views. Moreover, the translator's desire to erase from the Bible all traces of Catholic worship prompted him to replace some terms: "church" was replaced by "community", "priest" by "elder", "repent" by "repent" and so on. In addition, Tyndall's translation was modeled on the New Testament in Martin Luther's German translation.
Coverdale. In 1534 the Anglican Church petitioned the king for an English translation of the Bible. Archbishop Cranmer, the architect of Henry VIII's religious policy, took several steps on his own initiative to support the petition, but was unsuccessful. When Miles Coverdale, who was once an employee of Tyndale, completed his work and published in Germany the first complete Bible in English (1535), it soon got to England and was sold there without any objections from the authorities. Coverdale did not have Tyndall's learning. He borrowed from Tyndall a translation of the New Testament and partly of the Old Testament, but since Coverdale clearly did not speak Hebrew, he had to complete Tyndall's work, translating from Latin (although he looked into the writings of Luther, into the Zurich Bible and consulted contemporary scholars) . The language of Coverdale's translation is more melodious than Tyndall's; The psalter in his translation (the 1539 revision for the Great Bible) is still used in the Anglican Missal (Book of Public Worship), and for its literary merit it is often preferred to the King James Version of the Psalms.
Bible Matthew. In 1537 Henry VIII was persuaded to give his highest approval to the idea of ​​an English Bible; thus a "new translation" was born. It was believed to be a translation of a certain Thomas Matthew, although the real publisher was, apparently, another collaborator of Tyndale - John Rogers; the text itself was compiled from the translations of Tyndall and Coverdale, with the addition of many doctrinal notes. A fictitious translator was required in order to avoid a scandal in connection with the actual publication of the work of the executed Tyndall.
Big Bible. In 1538, a royal decree was issued, according to which each parish was obliged to purchase a copy of the Bible for its church, and parishioners had to reimburse half the cost of the book. The decree was probably not about the Matthew Bible, but about a new translation. In 1539 a new translation appeared, and this hefty volume was called the Great Bible. The editor was Coverdale, but the text was a revision of Matthew's Bible rather than the Coverdale translation of 1535. The second edition of 1540 is sometimes called the Cranmer Bible (prefaced by Archbishop Cranmer). The Big Bible became the official text, while other translations were banned.
Geneva Bible. The coming to power of the Catholic Mary Stuart horrified the English Protestants. To avoid persecution, many of them emigrated and settled in Geneva, in those years the center of radical Protestantism. Under the leadership of the Scottish Calvinist John Knox, and possibly with the participation of Coverdale, the English community in Geneva published the New Testament and the Psalter in 1557, and in 1560 a complete edition of the Bible, the so-called. The Geneva Bible (also known by the playful name of the Pants Bible, or the Breeches Bible, because Genesis 3:7 is translated as follows: "and they sewed together fig leaves, and made themselves pants"). The Genevan Bible was strikingly different in format from previous translations. There were several small-format editions of the New Testament, but the English Bible was intended to be read during church services with commentaries by clergy. It was typed in an old Gothic type, was large and very heavy; often, for safety, she was chained to a music stand. The Genevan Bible used a clear Latin script and was much smaller in size. It had the usual numbering of individual verses, as well as introductions to books and notes, maps of biblical history, a summary of Christian doctrine, an index and a glossary, various forms of prayer were given, notes were attached to the psalms. In a word, it was a very complete guide; its fullness and small size contributed to the formation of the habit of reading at home. The Genevan translation was, to a certain extent, the most scientific translation of its time. The text of the Great Bible (1550) was taken as the basis, which was then significantly improved by the editors, who corrected many errors and inaccuracies. The Geneva Bible almost immediately won recognition and popularity, but until 1576 it was not published in England. Although Queen Elizabeth I ascended the throne in 1558, the Anglican hierarchs were hostile to the Geneva Bible and sought to delay its publication. Once printed, it went through 140 editions and was produced during the lifetime of a generation, even after the publication of the King James Bible. It was the Bible that Shakespeare knew and quoted.
Episcopal Bible. Cranmer's conservative successor in the chair of the Archbishop of Canterbury, Matthew Parker, prevented the spread of the Geneva Bible. In 1568 he published his own edition, the Episcopal Bible. The name suggests that it was a collective effort by Anglican bishops who completed the task in just two years; they used the Great Bible as a basis, deviating from it only in those cases where it conflicted with the Hebrew or Greek texts. The Bishop's Bible often borrows passages from the Geneva Bible where its advantages in terms of translation accuracy are not in doubt. Upon completion, the Bishop's Bible replaced the Greater Bible as the official Bible of the Church of England.
King James Bible. The Puritan John Reynolds proposed the need for a new authoritative translation, addressing him to King James I in 1604. James approved the idea and appointed translators - "the men of science, fifty-four in number." The translators were divided into four groups, meeting at Westminster, Cambridge, and Oxford; each group took a part of the Bible, the initial, draft translation of which had to be approved by all members of the "company". A committee of 12 supervisors reviewed the first versions of the translation. The Bishop's Bible was chosen as the main text, but Tyndall's, Coverdale's, Matthew's Bible, the Great Bible, the Geneva Bible, and even the Catholic translation of the New Testament (published in 1582) were also involved in the work. The King James Bible was published in 1611: it took two years and nine months to translate, another nine months to prepare the manuscript for printing. The first edition was a large volume in folio, the text was typed in Gothic type. The King James Version would never have gained popularity if it had not been soon reprinted in small format and in Latin types (qualities that at one time ensured the widespread distribution of the Geneva Bible). For nearly 400 years, the King James Version has held the status of an official translation. In England, it is called the Officially Approved Translation (Authorized Version), although neither the royal house nor Parliament issued any official acts on this matter. Moreover, there is no doubt that the Authorized Translation became the Bible of the Anglican Church, as well as those who broke away from it in the 17th and 18th centuries. religious associations; it has the same status in the Protestant denominations of the United States. The king's printer held the right to publish the King James Version, so it could not be printed in the English colonies in the Americas until they gained independence from England. As a result, the first Bible printed in America was not the King James Bible, but John Eliot's translation for the Algonquin Indians (Up-Biblum God, 1661-1663). In the 18th century two universities provided editors (Paris from Cambridge and Blaney from Oxford) to correct the typographical errors and distortions that had crept in. In the United States, in the publication of N. Webster (1833), obsolete turns were replaced by more modern ones. This editorial work testifies to the efforts characteristic of the 19th century. and aimed at modernizing the old text.
Corrected translation (The Revised Version). The movement towards modernizing the language of the old translation reached a climax in 1870, when, at the initiative of the council of the clergy of the Diocese of Canterbury and York, a committee was appointed to revise the text of the King James Bible. The revised translation (New Testament, 1881; Old Testament, 1885; Apocrypha, 1895) is still of value to scholars for its brevity and proximity to the original biblical texts in Hebrew and Greek, but has not been able to replace the King James Version. The Revised Standard Version. The first US edition of the Revised Translation included readings by American experts who worked with the English editors. In 1901, these readings were included in the text of the edition, which was called the American Standard Translation (The American Standard Version). It formed the basis for the Revised Standard Translation, prepared with the support of the International Council for Religious Teaching (1937). Dean L. E. Weigl of Yale University made a general revision of this translation (the New Testament came out in 1946, the Old Testament in 1952).
New English Bible. In sharp contrast to the various revisions of the translations stands the attempt made in England to create an authoritative text of the English Bible for the 20th century. The New English Bible (New Testament, 1961; New Testament, Old Testament and Apocrypha, 1969) is a completely new, fresh translation of the original texts into 20th century natural, spoken English, which avoids both archaic constructions of the 17th century and literal copying of Greek phrases. This translation thus breaks with a tradition dating back to Tyndall. The translation was published with the support and participation of all Christian churches in Great Britain with the exception of the Roman Catholic Church.
English Catholic translations of the Bible. Douai-Rheims translation. The resistance of the Catholic Church to the idea of ​​translating the Bible into national languages ​​weakened during the Counter-Reformation. In 1582, the Reims New Testament appeared, translated from the Vulgate by G. Martin at the English College in Reims (France). It was followed by a translation of the Old Testament (1609-1610) made in the French city of Douai. It was started by Martin, and completed by Cardinal William Allen, president of the college, with his collaborators R. Bristow and T. Worthington. It was a painstakingly executed translation, made from the Vulgate, in many places sinning with an abundance of Latinisms and a literal copying of the original. In the period from 1635 to 1749, only the New Testament of the Due-Rheims translation was reprinted (6 times). However, in 1749-1750, Bishop Richard Challoner made numerous amendments, which, one might say, revived the Douai-Rheims translation to a new life.
Translation by Knox. The most important English Catholic translation in the 20th century. is a translation by Ronald Knox, published in 1945-1949. Knox has dealt extensively with the problems of translation, and his version is distinguished not only by accuracy but also by elegance. The Knox Bible is a translation officially approved by the church.
Westminster Bible. The English Jesuits began in 1913 the preparation of a new translation of the Bible made from the original languages ​​(i.e. from Hebrew and Greek). The New Testament from the Westminster Bible (as the translation was called) was published in 1948 under the direction of J. Murray and K. Latti.
Jerusalem Bible. In the second half of the 20th century There were two Catholic translations into English and French, called the Jerusalem Bible. A French commentary translation (from the original texts) was made at the Dominican Bible School in Jerusalem and published in 1956. In 1966 English scholars made their own translation, also from the original texts.
New American Bible. In the United States, the Bishops' Committee for the Fellowship of Christian Doctrine funded a series of Bible translations from the original languages ​​of Hebrew and Greek. Translations of selected books, prepared with the support of this fraternity, began to appear in 1952, and the complete New American Bible was released in 1970. It replaced the old Douai-Rheims translation.
Bible translations for Jews. Translations of the Bible specifically for the Jews began to be done relatively recently. In the 18th century two translations of the Torah were published, one of them was made by the Jewish scholar I. Delgado (1785), the other by D. Levy (1787). However, the first complete translation of the Hebrew Bible was published in England only in 1851, its author was A. Benish. In 1853, I. Lizer published a translation in the USA, which became universally recognized in American synagogues. After the publication in England of the Revised Translation (1885), English Jews began to use this edition, providing it with notes and some readings that deviated from the English versions (this work was carried out by Jewish scholars). In 1892, the American Association of Jewish Publishers began preparing their own translation of the Hebrew Bible, based on the text of Aaron ben Asher (10th century), but taking into account ancient translations and modern English versions. This translation was published in 1917 and replaced Leeser's as the standard English translation of the Bible for American Jews. In 1963-1982 a new version of the American Jewish Publishers Association's translation was released. Her style is emphatically modern and free from the influence of the King James Bible. The publication is characterized by an abundance of notes, which provide options for translations and interpretations.
Other translations. From the beginning of the 16th century many unofficial translations have been made without the support or approval of any church groups. Incomplete translations (Psalms, prayers, passages from the gospels) appeared in a series of prayer books from 1529 to 1545. T. More translated individual parts of the Bible while imprisoned in the Tower of London in 1534-1535. R. Taverner prepared in 1539 a new edition of Matthew's translation. Around 1550, J. Cheek translated the Gospel of Matthew in an unusual, touching style. In the 18th century Several translations have appeared that have only historical value. Among them, it is worth noting the translations of D. Mace (1729), E. Harwood (1768) and J. Wakefield (1791). Modern non-church translations trace their history back to the translation of E. Norton, a Unitarian pastor, who in 1855 published his translation of the gospels. The New Testament was popular for the 20th century. (The Twentieth Century New Testament, 1898-1901); New Testament of Moffat (Moffat "s New Testament, 1913); Goodspeed's New Testament (1923), which, together with translations of the Old Testament, became part of the American translation (An American Translation, 1931). Of the most popular publications, one can name J. B. Philips' arrangement for modern colloquial English (New Testament in Modern English, 1958). The Revised Standard Version Common Bible (1973), based on the 1952 Revised Standard Translation, has been approved for use by Orthodox, Protestant, and Catholic denominations. The Good News Bible, a modern English translation of the Bible, was released by the American Bible Society in 1976. the literary style of the original King James Version, and Reader's Digest Bible, a condensed version of the Revised Standard Translation.
LITERATURE
canonical gospels. M., 1992 Teaching. Pentateuch of Moses. M., 1993 Bible Encyclopedia. M., 1996 Metzger B. Textology of the New Testament. M., 1996 Metzger B. Canon of the New Testament. M., 1999

Collier Encyclopedia. - Open Society. 2000 .

Similar posts