Tropes epithet comparison personification metaphor. Expressive means of language in the artistic style of speech: epithet, comparison, personification, metaphor. Asserting itself in the nominative function, the metaphor loses its figurativeness: “the neck of the bottle”, “pansies”,

AND ) - this is a set of speech elements (special for each style of speech of words and ways of constructing sentences).

A type of speech it is a way of presenting, building words and sentences in a logical order.

Depending on the content of the text, the following types of speech are distinguished - narrative, description, reasoning.

Tired of homework and essays?

Try your luck and maybe you will be lucky today. Just imagine how your life will change if you hit the jackpot 🙂
In general, register - it's absolutely free. And then you decide for yourself what you're lucky.

Consider the features of each type of speech.

Narration is a story about an event that takes place in a certain period of time. The actions reflected in the event are sequential, logically connected with each other. The narrative can go both from the third person and from the first, and it is characterized by such elements as the plot (the beginning of the event), the development of the action and the denouement (the result of the described event).

Since the narrative is an eventful text, its speech feature is a large number of verbs and a chain development of the action. The text answers the questions “what? where? when?" - what's happened? where and with whom did it happen? when did it happen?

Narration happens pictorial(emphasis on changing images that “show” the event) and informative(the text not only tells about the event, but also explains it, includes interesting facts).

Narrative text example:

“In the night a strong wind arose and it began to rain. It drummed softly on the roof and ran down the glass, turning the world outside into a blur. Streams of water washed away dust from trees and sidewalks, murmured in gutters, cooled the city, which was hot from the summer heat. And those who did not sleep opened the windows, inhaled the damp coolness and exposed their faces to the ice drops. The city had been waiting for rain for two months, and now, when it came, people silently smiled, blessing the weeping sky…”

An exemplary text - a pictorial narrative - answers the following questions:

  1. what's happened? - It's raining in the city
  2. where and with whom did it happen? - city dwellers waited for the rain;
  1. when did it happen? - it rained in the summer.

Description - this is a verbal image of an object, phenomenon, event. The description lists and reveals the main features of the selected item. The goal is to present the reader of the text with an image that is easy to imagine in paint. The unity of time and place of manifestation of signs is important.

The description text consists of the following parts:

  1. general characteristics of the object, general impression;
  2. signs, details;
  3. general assessment of the subject.

For example, the description can be portrait, landscape; anything can be the object of writing - a person, and his emotional state, and an animal, and a plant, and a place (a city, a hotel house, a park, a village), and the weather. Speech feature - the predominance of nouns, adjectives, adverbs, a minimum of action and static text.

Descriptive text answers the questions “what? what kind?" (What object is described? How does it look? What are its qualities and properties?).

Description text example:

“It was raining for the third day. Gray, small and harmful. Unpredictable, like a low gray sky. Endless. Endless. He restlessly knocked on the windows and rustled softly on the roof. Gloomy and careless. Annoying. Bored.”

Sample text answers descriptive questions:

  1. what subject is being described? - rain;
  1. what is the subject? - gray, small, harmful, unpredictable, endless, etc.

reasoning - this is the development and confirmation of thought, the explanation of the phenomenon (properties of the object) and the expression of one's own opinion. Reasoning answers the questions “why? why?".

The reasoning consists of the following parts:

  1. thesis - a thought that needs to be proved;
  2. substantiation of the thesis, supporting argumentation with examples, evidence;
  3. summary - results, conclusions.

The text of reasoning is aimed at convincing, explaining, proving. Reasoning is characterized by the active use of rhetorical questions and introductory words - bundles: firstly ... secondly ... thirdly ... therefore (thus, respectively); meanwhile, because, so.

Reasoning is as follows:

  1. reasoning-proof (why so, and not otherwise? What follows from this?);
  2. reasoning-explanation (what is it? where did it come from? why is the subject like this?);
  3. reasoning-thinking (how to be? To be or not to be? What to do?).

Reasoning text example:

“So, the night will pass, and the rain will stop, the thunder will rumble. So, what is next? Again - the exhausting heat of a stuffy summer? Again - hot asphalt? Again - a city choking in the dust? Or will the weather take pity on tired city dwellers and give at least a week of coolness? Since forecasters are blurry and vague, we can only wait and watch.”

An exemplary text - reasoning-thinking - answers the following questions:

  1. why? - because the rain will end and the heat that bothers everyone will return;
  1. why? - to imagine what to expect from capricious nature.


Types of speech are ways of presentation that solve the following author's tasks:

  • narrative - dynamically reflects reality, tells about its events; narration is a clip, a movie, a change of shots;
  • description - depicts a static reality, studies the object of interest from all sides; the description is a photograph, a frozen frame;
  • reasoning - looks for causal relationships between events and phenomena, expresses the opinion of the author, "because ..."; this is a diagram with blocks of theses and evidence and arrows - logical questions.

And finally, a reminder: do not confuse functional speech styles with types of speech. 😉 After all, for example, a newspaper article of a journalistic style of speech can be both narrative (reporting from the scene), and descriptive (a note about a missing person; an advertisement for a new building), and reasoning (an analytical article).

All materials posted on the site are intended for non-commercial use and are protected by the legislation of the Russian Federation (Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Part Four).
Copying is prohibited.
Partial citation of articles and training materials is possible only with the obligatory indication of the source in the form of an active link.

Means of enhancing the expressiveness of speech. The concept of a path. Types of tropes: epithet, metaphor, comparison, metonymy, synecdoche, hyperbole, litote, irony, allegory, personification, paraphrase.

A trope is a rhetorical figure, word or expression used in a figurative sense in order to enhance the figurativeness of the language, the artistic expressiveness of speech. Tropes are widely used in literary works, oratory and in everyday speech.

The main types of tropes: Epithet, metaphor, simile, metonymy, synecdoche, hyperbole, litote, irony, allegory, personification, paraphrase.

An epithet is a definition attached to a word that affects its expressiveness. It is expressed mainly by an adjective, but also by an adverb (“to love passionately”), a noun (“fun noise”), a numeral (second life).

An epithet is a word or a whole expression, which, due to its structure and special function in the text, acquires some new meaning or semantic connotation, helps the word (expression) to acquire color, richness. It is used in both poetry and prose.

Epithets can be expressed by different parts of speech (mother-Volga, wind-tramp, bright eyes, damp earth). Epithets are a very common concept in literature, without them it is impossible to imagine a single work of art.

Under us with a cast-iron roar
Bridges instantly rattle. (A. A. Fet)

Metaphor (“transfer”, “figurative meaning”) is a trope, word or expression used in a figurative sense, which is based on an unnamed comparison of an object with some other one on the basis of their common feature. A figure of speech consisting in the use of words and expressions in a figurative sense on the basis of some kind of analogy, similarity, comparison.

There are 4 “elements” in the metaphor:

An object within a specific category,

The process by which this object performs a function,

Applications of this process to real situations, or intersections with them.

In lexicology, a semantic relationship between the meanings of one polysemantic word, based on the presence of similarity (structural, external, functional).

Metaphor often becomes an aesthetic end in itself and displaces the original original meaning of the word.

In the modern theory of metaphor, it is customary to distinguish between diaphora (sharp, contrasting metaphor) and epiphora (usual, erased metaphor).

An extended metaphor is a metaphor that is consistently implemented over a large fragment of a message or the entire message as a whole. Model: "The hunger for books continues: products from the book market are increasingly stale - they have to be thrown away without even trying."

A realized metaphor involves operating a metaphorical expression without taking into account its figurative nature, that is, as if the metaphor had a direct meaning. The result of the realization of a metaphor is often comical. Model: "I lost my temper and got on the bus."

Vanya is a real loach; This is not a cat, but a bandit (M.A. Bulgakov);

I do not regret, do not call, do not cry,
Everything will pass like smoke from white apple trees.
Withering gold embraced,
I won't be young anymore. (S. A. Yesenin)

Comparison

Comparison is a trope in which one object or phenomenon is likened to another according to some common feature for them. The purpose of the comparison is to reveal new, important properties that are advantageous for the subject of the statement in the object of comparison.

In comparison, the following are distinguished: the object being compared (object of comparison), the object with which the comparison takes place (means of comparison), and their common feature (base of comparison, comparative feature). One of the distinguishing features of comparison is the mention of both compared objects, while the common feature is not always mentioned. Comparison should be distinguished from metaphor.

Comparisons are characteristic of folklore.

Comparison types

There are different types of comparisons:

Comparisons in the form of a comparative turnover, formed with the help of unions as if, as if, exactly: "A man is stupid as a pig, but cunning as hell." Non-union comparisons - in the form of a sentence with a compound nominal predicate: "My house is my fortress." Comparisons formed with the help of a noun in the instrumental case: "he walks like a gogol." Negative comparisons: "An attempt is not torture."

Crazy years, the extinct fun is hard for me, like a vague hangover (A.S. Pushkin);

Under it is a stream lighter than azure (M.Yu. Lermontov);

Metonymy

Metonymy (“renaming”, “name”) is a type of trope, a phrase in which one word is replaced by another, denoting an object (phenomenon) that is in one or another (spatial, temporal, etc.) connection with the object that is indicated replaced word. The replacement word is used in a figurative sense.

Metonymy should be distinguished from metaphor, with which it is often confused: metonymy is based on the replacement of words “by adjacency” (part instead of the whole or vice versa, class representative instead of the whole class or vice versa, receptacle instead of content or vice versa) and metaphor - “by similarity”. Synecdoche is a special case of metonymy.

Example: "All flags will visit us", where "flags" means "countries" (a part replaces the whole). The meaning of metonymy is that it singles out a property in a phenomenon that, by its nature, can replace the rest. Thus, metonymy essentially differs from metaphor, on the one hand, by a greater real relationship of substituting members, and on the other hand, by greater limitation, the elimination of those features that are not directly noticeable in this phenomenon. Like metaphor, metonymy is inherent in language in general (cf., for example, the word “wiring”, the meaning of which is metonymically extended from action to its result), but it has a special meaning in artistic and literary creativity.

In early Soviet literature, an attempt to maximize the use of metonymy both theoretically and practically was made by the constructivists, who put forward the principle of the so-called “locality” (motivation of verbal means by the theme of the work, that is, their limitation by real dependence on the theme). However, this attempt was not sufficiently substantiated, since the promotion of metonymy to the detriment of metaphor is illegitimate: these are two different ways of establishing a connection between phenomena, not excluding, but complementing each other.

Types of metonymy:

General language, general poetic, general newspaper, individual-author's, individual-creative.

Examples:

"Hand of Moscow"

"I ate three plates"

“Black tailcoats flashed and rushed apart and in heaps here and there”

Synecdoche

Synecdoche is a trope, a kind of metonymy, based on the transfer of meaning from one phenomenon to another on the basis of a quantitative relationship between them. Usually used in synecdoche:

Singular instead of plural: "Everything is sleeping - both man, and beast, and bird." (Gogol);

Plural instead of singular: "We all look at Napoleons." (Pushkin);

A part instead of a whole: “Have you any need? “In the roof for my family.” (Herzen);

The generic name instead of the specific one: "Well, sit down, luminary." (Mayakovsky) (instead of: the sun);

The specific name instead of the generic one: "Better than all, take care of the penny." (Gogol) (instead of: money).

Hyperbola

Hyperbole (“transition; excess, excess; exaggeration”) is a stylistic figure of explicit and intentional exaggeration, in order to enhance expressiveness and emphasize the thought said. For example: "I've said this a thousand times" or "we have enough food for six months."

Hyperbole is often combined with other stylistic devices, giving them the appropriate coloring: hyperbolic comparisons, metaphors (“the waves rose like mountains”). The character or situation depicted can also be hyperbolic. Hyperbole is also characteristic of the rhetorical, oratorical style, as a means of pathetic uplift, as well as the romantic style, where pathos is in contact with irony.

Examples:

Phraseological units and winged expressions

"sea of ​​tears"

"fast as lightning", "lightning fast"

"as numerous as the sand on the seashore"

“We haven’t seen each other for a hundred years!”

Prose

Ivan Nikiforovich, on the contrary, has trousers with such wide folds that if they were blown up, the whole yard with barns and buildings could be placed in them.

N. Gogol. The story of how Ivan Ivanovich quarreled with Ivan Nikiforovich

A million Cossack hats suddenly poured into the square. …

... for one hilt of my saber they give me the best herd and three thousand sheep.

N. Gogol. Taras Bulba

Poems, songs

About our meeting - what is there to say,
I waited for her, as they wait for natural disasters,
But you and I immediately began to live,
Without fear of detrimental consequences!

Litotes

Litota, litotes (simplicity, smallness, moderation) - a trope that has the meaning of understatement or deliberate mitigation.

Litota is a figurative expression, a stylistic figure, a turnover, which contains an artistic understatement of the size, strength of the meaning of the depicted object or phenomenon. Litota in this sense is the opposite of hyperbole, so it is called inverse hyperbole in another way. In litotes, on the basis of some common feature, two heterogeneous phenomena are compared, but this feature is represented in the phenomenon-means of comparison to a much lesser extent than in the phenomenon-object of comparison.

For example: “A horse the size of a cat”, “A person’s life is one moment”, etc.

Many litots are phraseological units or idioms: “turtle pace”, “at hand”, “the cat cried money”, “the sky seemed like a sheepskin”.

There is a litote in folk and literary tales: “Boy-with-a-finger”, “man-with-nail”, “girl-inch”.

Litota (otherwise: antenantiosis or antenantiosis) is also called a stylistic figure of deliberate softening of an expression by replacing a word or expression containing the assertion of some feature with an expression that denies the opposite feature. That is, an object or concept is defined through the negation of the opposite. For example: “smart” - “not stupid”, “agree” - “I don’t mind”, “cold” - “not warm”, “low” - “low”, “famous” - “notorious”, “dangerous” - “ unsafe", "good" - "not bad". In this meaning, litote is one of the forms of euphemism (a word or descriptive expression that is neutral in meaning and emotional “load”, usually used in texts and public statements to replace other words and expressions that are considered indecent or inappropriate.).

... and love for his wife will grow cold in him

Irony

Irony (“mockery”) is a trope, while the meaning, from the point of view of due, is hidden or contradicts (opposed) to the explicit `meaning`. Irony creates the feeling that the subject matter is not what it seems. Irony is the use of words in a negative sense, directly opposite to the literal one. Example: “Well, you are brave!”, “Smart-smart ...” Here, positive statements have a negative connotation.

Forms of irony

Direct irony is a way to belittle, give a negative or funny character to the described phenomenon.

Anti-irony is the opposite of direct irony and allows the object of anti-irony to be underestimated.

Self-irony is irony directed at one's own person. In self-irony and anti-irony, negative statements can imply a reverse (positive) connotation. Example: "Where can we, fools, drink tea."

Socratic irony is a form of self-irony, constructed in such a way that the object to which it is addressed, as if on its own, comes to natural logical conclusions and finds the hidden meaning of the ironic statement, following the premises of the “not knowing the truth” subject.

An ironic worldview is a state of mind that allows you not to take common statements and stereotypes on faith, and not to take various "generally recognized values" too seriously.

"Did you all sing? This is the case:
So come on, dance!" (I. A. Krylov)

Allegory

Allegory (narrative) is an artistic comparison of ideas (concepts) through a specific artistic image or dialogue.

As a trope, allegory is used in poetry, parables, and morality. It arose on the basis of mythology, was reflected in folklore and developed in the visual arts. The main way of depicting allegory is a generalization of human concepts; representations are revealed in the images and behavior of animals, plants, mythological and fairy-tale characters, inanimate objects, which acquire a figurative meaning.

Example: justice - Themis (a woman with scales).

The nightingale is sad at the defeated rose,
hysterically sings over the flower.
But the garden scarecrow is shedding tears,
who secretly loved the rose.

Aidyn Khanmagomedov. two loves

Allegory is the artistic isolation of extraneous concepts, with the help of specific representations. Religion, love, soul, justice, strife, glory, war, peace, spring, summer, autumn, winter, death, etc. are depicted and presented as living beings. The qualities and appearance attached to these living beings are borrowed from the actions and consequences of what corresponds to the isolation contained in these concepts, for example, the isolation of battle and war is indicated by means of military weapons, the seasons - by means of the flowers, fruits or occupations corresponding to them, impartiality - by means of weights and blindfolds, death through clepsydra and scythes.

That with a quivering relish,
then a friend in the arms of the soul,
like a lily with a poppy,
kisses with the heart of the soul.

Aidyn Khanmagomedov. Kissing pun.

personification

Personification (personification, prosopopoeia) is a trope, the attribution of properties and signs of animate objects to inanimate ones. Very often, personification is used in the depiction of nature, which is endowed with certain human features.

Examples:

And woe, woe, grief!
And grief girded itself with a bast,
Feet are entangled with bast.

folk song

The personification was widespread in the poetry of different eras and peoples, from folklore lyrics to poetic works of romantic poets, from precision poetry to the work of the Oberiuts.

paraphrase

In stylistics and poetics, periphrase (paraphrase, periphrase; “descriptive expression”, “allegory”, “statement”) is a trope that descriptively expresses one concept with the help of several.

Paraphrase - an indirect reference to an object by not naming it, but describing it (for example, “night luminary” = “moon” or “I love you, Peter's creation!” = “I love you, St. Petersburg!”).

In paraphrases, the names of objects and people are replaced by indications of their characteristics, for example, “writer of these lines” instead of “I” in the author’s speech, “fall into a dream” instead of “fall asleep”, “king of beasts” instead of “lion”, “one-armed bandit” instead of "slot machine". There are logical paraphrases (“the author of Dead Souls”) and figurative paraphrases (“the sun of Russian poetry”).

Often the paraphrase is used to descriptively express "low" or "forbidden" concepts ("unclean" instead of "hell", "get by with a handkerchief" instead of "blow your nose"). In these cases, the paraphrase is also a euphemism. // Literary encyclopedia: Dictionary of literary terms: in 2 volumes - M.; L .: Publishing house L. D. Frenkel, 1925. T. 2. P-Ya. - Stb. 984-986.

4. Khazagerov G. G.Persuasive speech system as homeostasis: oratorics, homiletics, didactics, symbolism// Sociological journal. - 2001. - No. 3.

5. Nikolaev A.I. Lexical means of expression// Nikolaev A.I. Fundamentals of literary criticism: a textbook for students of philological specialties. - Ivanovo: LISTOS, 2011. - S. 121-139.

6. Panov M.I. trails// Pedagogical speech science: Dictionary-reference book / ed. T. A. Ladyzhenskaya, A. K. Mikhalskaya. M.: Flinta; Science, 1998.

7. Toporov V.N. trails// Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary / ch. ed. V. N. Yartseva. M.: Soviet Encyclopedia, 1990.


B8

Means of artistic expression

Possible difficulties

good advice

The text may contain words already existing in the Russian language, rethought by the author and used in an unusual combination for them, for example: spring language.

Such words can be considered individual author's neologisms only if they acquire some fundamentally new meaning in this context, for example: water - "plumber", quarter - "set marks for a quarter."

In the above example, the word spring means "clean, unpolluted" and is an epithet.

Sometimes it is difficult to distinguish between an epithet and a metaphor.

The night was lit up with golden lights.

Metaphor is a figurative technique based on the transfer of meaning by likeness, similarity, analogy, for example: The sea laughed. This girl is a beautiful flower.

An epithet is a special case of a metaphor expressed in an artistic definition, for example: lead clouds, wavy fog.

The above example contains both a metaphor (the night bloomed with lights) and an epithet (gold).

Comparison as a pictorial device can be difficult to distinguish from cases of using unions (particles) as if, as if, with other goals.

This is exactly our street. People saw him disappear into the alley.

To make sure the sentence has a figurative device comparison, you need to find what is compared with what. If there are no two compared objects in the sentence, then there is no comparison in it either.

This is exactly our street. - there is no comparison here, the affirmative particle is used exactly.

People saw him disappear into the alley. - there is no comparison here, the union as an explanatory clause attaches.

The cloud swept across the sky like a huge kite. The kettle whistled like a badly tuned radio. - in these sentences, comparison is used as a visual device. A cloud is compared to a kite, a teapot is compared to a radio receiver.

Metaphor as a figurative device is sometimes difficult to distinguish from a linguistic metaphor, reflected in the figurative meaning of a word.

At a physical education lesson, children learned to jump over a horse.

The language metaphor, as a rule, is enshrined in the explanatory dictionary as a figurative meaning of the word.

At a physical education lesson, children learned to jump over a horse. - In this sentence, the horse metaphor is not used as a figurative device, this is the usual figurative meaning of the word.

The value of metaphor as a pictorial technique lies in its novelty and unexpectedness of the similarity discovered by the author.

And autumn rips off a fiery wig with rainy paws.

What is personification? Personification is the assignment to the inanimate of the attributes of living beings. For example: tired nature; the sun is smiling; the voice of the wind; singing trees; Bullets sang, machine guns pounded, the wind pressed his palms against his chest ...; More and more bleak, more and more clearly the wind rips the years over the shoulders.

Also in the assignment are:

Antithesis - opposition.

Gradation is a stylistic figure, which consists in such an arrangement of words, in which each subsequent word contains an increasing or decreasing value.

Oxymoron - a combination of directly opposite words in order to show the inconsistency of the phenomenon.

Hyperbole is an artistic exaggeration.

Litota is an artistic understatement.

Paraphrase - replacing the name of an object with a description of its essential features. For example: the king of beasts (instead of a lion).

Obsolete words as a pictorial device

Colloquial and colloquial vocabulary as a pictorial device

Phraseologisms as a pictorial device

rhetorical question, rhetorical exclamation, rhetorical appeal

Lexical repetition

Syntax parallelism

Incompleteness of sentences (ellipsis)

What is a phraseological unit, epithet, metaphor, comparison, personification, hyperbole? and got the best answer

Answer from Camila[guru]
Phraseologism, or phraseological unit, is also an idiom (from the Greek ἴδιος - own, peculiar) - a stable phrase that performs the function of a separate word, used as a whole, not subject to further decomposition and usually does not allow rearrangement of its parts. The meaning of a phraseological unit is not deducible from the meanings of its constituent components (for example, "give back" - to respond with a blow to a blow, "railway" - a special type of communication with rails for a train, sleepers, etc., and not just a road paved with iron ) . Epithet (from other Greek ἐπίθετον - “attached”) is a definition of a word that affects its expressiveness. It is expressed mainly by an adjective, but also by an adverb (“to love passionately”), a noun (“fun noise”), a numeral (second life). METAPHORA (Greek metaphora - "transfer") - a kind of artistic trope (Greek tropos - "revolution"), one of the ways of artistic shaping, which consists in the convergence and connection of individual images (not related to each other in real life) into a whole (see . composition; integrity). Comparison is a figurative expression built on a comparison of two objects, concepts or states that have a common feature, due to which the artistic significance of the first object is enhanced. Personification (personification, prosopopoeia) is a trope, the attribution of properties and signs of animate objects to inanimate ones. Hyperbole (Greek hyperbole - excess, exaggeration; from hyper - through, over and bole - throw, throwing) - a stylistic figure of explicit and intentional exaggeration, in order to enhance expressiveness and emphasize the thought said, for example, “I said this a thousand times” or “ we have enough food for six months.”

Answer from Sanya_is_Chapa[newbie]
Yes


Answer from Polly Iibuna[newbie]
A metaphor is when a verb is used in a figurative sense. For example: branches of mountain ash are burning. Explanation: Village branches cannot burn, they are red.
Personification is when something that is not alive becomes alive. For example: A light looked out of the stove. Explanation: Fire cannot see.
An epithet is a beautiful expression. For example: Red girl. Explanation: The girl is beautiful, not red.
Comparison is when you compare something with something. For example: The field is golden like the sun. Explanation: The field is just yellow, but it's not the sun.
Hyperbole is an exaggeration. For example: A very creepy lesson. Explanation: we always think before school that it is scary there. But we just exaggerated.
Phraseologism is a figurative expression. For example: weigh noodles on your ears. Tell a lie. etc.


Answer from 3 answers[guru]

Speech. Analysis of expressive means.

It is necessary to distinguish between tropes (figurative and expressive means of literature) based on the figurative meaning of words and figures of speech based on the syntactic structure of the sentence.

Lexical means.

Usually, in the review of task B8, an example of a lexical means is given in brackets, either in one word or in a phrase in which one of the words is in italics.

synonyms(contextual, linguistic) - words that are close in meaning soon - soon - one of these days - not today or tomorrow, in the near future
antonyms(contextual, linguistic) - words that are opposite in meaning they never said to each other you, but always you.
phraseological units- stable combinations of words that are close in lexical meaning to one word at the edge of the world (= “far away”), missing teeth (= “frozen”)
archaisms- obsolete words squad, province, eyes
dialectism- Vocabulary common in a certain area chicken, goof
book,

colloquial vocabulary

daring, associate;

corrosion, management;

squander money, outback

Trails.

In the review, examples of tropes are indicated in brackets, as a phrase.

Types of trails and examples for them in the table:

metaphor- transferring the meaning of a word by similarity dead silence
personification- likening an object or phenomenon to a living being dissuadedgolden grove
comparison- comparison of one object or phenomenon with another (expressed through unions as, as if, as if, comparative degree of adjective) bright as the sun
metonymy- replacement of the direct name with another by adjacency (i.e. based on real connections) The hiss of foamy glasses (instead of: foamy wine in glasses)
synecdoche- the use of the name of the part instead of the whole and vice versa a lonely sail turns white (instead of: a boat, a ship)
paraphrase– replacing a word or group of words to avoid repetition author of "Woe from Wit" (instead of A.S. Griboyedov)
epithet- the use of definitions that give the expression imagery and emotionality Where are you going, proud horse?
allegory- expression of abstract concepts in specific artistic images scales - justice, cross - faith, heart - love
hyperbola- exaggeration of the size, strength, beauty of the described in a hundred and forty suns the sunset burned
litotes- underestimation of the size, strength, beauty of the described your spitz, lovely spitz, no more than a thimble
irony- the use of a word or expression in the reverse sense of the literal, with the aim of ridicule Where, smart, are you wandering, head?

Figures of speech, sentence structure.

In task B8, the figure of speech is indicated by the number of the sentence given in brackets.

epiphora- repetition of words at the end of sentences or lines following one another I would like to know. Why am I titular councilor? Why exactly titular councilor?
gradation- construction of homogeneous members of the sentence by increasing meaning or vice versa came, saw, conquered
anaphora- repetition of words at the beginning of sentences or lines following one another Ironthe truth is alive with envy,

Ironpestle, and iron ovary.

pun- play on words It was raining and two students.
rhetorical exclamation (question, appeal) - exclamatory, interrogative sentences or a sentence with an appeal that do not require a response from the addressee Why are you standing, swaying, thin mountain ash?

Long live the sun, long live the darkness!

syntactic parallelism- the same construction of sentences young everywhere we have a road,

old people everywhere we honor

polyunion- repetition of an excess union And a sling, and an arrow, and a crafty dagger

Years spare the winner ...

asyndeton- construction of complex sentences or a series of homogeneous members without unions Flickering past the booth, women,

Boys, benches, lanterns ...

ellipsis- omission of implied word I'm behind a candle - a candle in the stove
inversion- indirect word order Our amazing people.
antithesis- opposition (often expressed through the unions A, BUT, HOWEVER or antonyms Where the table was food, there is a coffin
oxymoron- a combination of two contradictory concepts living corpse, ice fire
citation- transmission in the text of other people's thoughts, statements indicating the author of these words. As it is said in the poem by N. Nekrasov: “You have to bow your head below the thin bylinochka ...”
questionable-reciprocal the form statements- the text is presented in the form of rhetorical questions and answers to them And again a metaphor: "Live under minute houses ...". What do they mean? Nothing lasts forever, everything is subject to decay and destruction
ranks homogeneous members of the proposal- enumeration of homogeneous concepts He was waiting for a long, serious illness, leaving the sport.
parceling- a sentence that is divided into intonation-semantic speech units. I saw the sun. Above your head.

Remember!

When completing task B8, you should remember that you fill in the gaps in the review, i.e. restore the text, and with it the semantic and grammatical connection. Therefore, an analysis of the review itself can often serve as an additional clue: various adjectives of one kind or another, predicates that agree with omissions, etc.

It will facilitate the task and the division of the list of terms into two groups: the first includes terms based on changes in the meaning of the word, the second - the structure of the sentence.

Parsing the task.

(1) The Earth is a cosmic body, and we are astronauts making a very long flight around the Sun, together with the Sun through the infinite Universe. (2) The life support system on our beautiful ship is so ingenious that it is constantly self-renewing and thus keeps billions of passengers traveling for millions of years.

(3) It is difficult to imagine astronauts flying on a ship through outer space, deliberately destroying a complex and delicate life support system designed for a long flight. (4) But gradually, consistently, with amazing irresponsibility, we are putting this life support system out of action, poisoning rivers, cutting down forests, spoiling the oceans. (5) If astronauts fussily cut wires, unscrew screws, drill holes in the skin on a small spacecraft, then this will have to be qualified as suicide. (6) But there is no fundamental difference between a small ship and a large one. (7) It's only a matter of size and time.

(8) Humanity, in my opinion, is a kind of disease of the planet. (9) Wound up, multiply, swarm microscopic, on a planetary, and even more so on a universal, scale of being. (10) They accumulate in one place, and immediately deep ulcers and various growths appear on the body of the earth. (11) One has only to introduce a drop of harmful (from the point of view of the earth and nature) culture into the green coat of the Forest (a team of lumberjacks, one barracks, two tractors) - and now a characteristic, symptomatic painful spot spreads from this place. (12) They scurry, multiply, do their work, eating away the bowels, depleting the fertility of the soil, poisoning the rivers and oceans, the very atmosphere of the Earth with their poisonous administrations.

(13) Unfortunately, just as vulnerable as the biosphere, just as defenseless against the pressure of the so-called technical progress, are such concepts as silence, the possibility of solitude and intimate communication between man and nature, with the beauty of our land. (14) On the one hand, a person, twitched by the inhuman rhythm of modern life, crowding, a huge flow of artificial information, is weaned from spiritual communication with the outside world, on the other hand, this outside world itself has been brought to such a state that sometimes it no longer invites a person to spiritual fellowship with him.

(15) It is not known how this original disease called humanity will end for the planet. (16) Will the Earth have time to develop some kind of antidote?

(According to V. Soloukhin)

“The first two sentences use a trope like _______. This image of the "cosmic body" and "cosmonauts" is the key to understanding the author's position. Discussing how humanity behaves in relation to its home, V. Soloukhin comes to the conclusion that "humanity is a disease of the planet." ______ (“they scurry, multiply, do their job, eating away the bowels, depleting the fertility of the soil, poisoning the rivers and oceans, the very atmosphere of the Earth with their poisonous administrations”) convey the negative deeds of man. The use of _________ in the text (sentences 8, 13, 14) emphasizes that everything said by the author is far from being indifferent. Used in the 15th sentence ________ "original" gives the argument a sad ending, which ends with a question.

List of terms:

  1. epithet
  2. litotes
  3. introductory words and interstitial constructions
  4. irony
  5. extended metaphor
  6. parceling
  7. question-answer form of presentation
  8. dialectism
  9. homogeneous members of a sentence

We divide the list of terms into two groups: the first - epithet, litote, irony, extended metaphor, dialectism; the second - introductory words and plug-in constructions, parcelling, question-answer form of presentation, homogeneous members of the sentence.

It is better to start the task with passes that do not cause difficulties. For example, omission #2. Since the whole sentence is given as an example, some syntactic means is most likely implied. In a sentence “they scurry, multiply, do their job, eating away the bowels, depleting the fertility of the soil, poisoning the rivers and oceans, the very atmosphere of the Earth with their poisonous departures” rows of homogeneous members of the sentence are used : Verbs scurry, multiply, do business, gerunds eating away, exhausting, poisoning and nouns rivers, oceans, atmosphere. At the same time, the verb “transfer” in the review indicates that the place of the gap should be a plural word. In the list in the plural there are introductory words and plug-in constructions and homogeneous member sentences. A careful reading of the sentence shows that the introductory words, i.e. those constructions that are not thematically related to the text and can be removed from the text without losing their meaning are absent. Thus, at the place of pass No. 2, it is necessary to insert option 9) homogeneous members of the sentence.

In pass number 3, the numbers of sentences are indicated, which means that the term again refers to the structure of sentences. Parceling can be immediately “discarded”, since the authors must indicate two or three consecutive sentences. The question-answer form is also an incorrect option, since sentences 8, 13, 14 do not contain a question. There are introductory words and plug-in constructions. We find them in sentences: in my opinion, unfortunately, on the one hand, on the other hand.

In place of the last gap, it is necessary to substitute the masculine term, since the adjective “used” must agree with it in the review, and it must be from the first group, since only one word is given as an example “ original". Masculine terms - epithet and dialectism. The latter is clearly not suitable, since this word is quite understandable. Turning to the text, we find what the word is combined with: "original disease". Here, the adjective is clearly used in a figurative sense, so we have an epithet in front of us.

It remains to fill only the first gap, which is the most difficult. The review says that this is a trope, and it is used in two sentences, where the image of the earth and us, people, as an image of a cosmic body and astronauts is rethought. This is clearly not irony, since there is not a drop of mockery in the text, and not litotes, but rather, on the contrary, the author deliberately exaggerates the scale of the disaster. Thus, the only possible option remains - a metaphor, the transfer of properties from one object or phenomenon to another based on our associations. Expanded - because it is impossible to isolate a separate phrase from the text.

Answer: 5, 9, 3, 1.

Practice.

(1) As a child, I hated matinees, because my father came to our kindergarten. (2) He sat on a chair near the Christmas tree, chirped on his button accordion for a long time, trying to find the right melody, and our teacher strictly told him: “Valery Petrovich, higher!” (Z) All the guys looked at my father and choked with laughter. (4) He was small, plump, began to go bald early, and although he never drank, for some reason his nose always had a beet red color, like that of a clown. (5) Children, when they wanted to say about someone that he was funny and ugly, said this: “He looks like Ksyushka’s dad!”

(6) And at first in the kindergarten, and then at school, I carried the heavy cross of my father's absurdity. (7) Everything would be fine (you never know who has any fathers!), But it was not clear to me why he, an ordinary locksmith, went to our matinees with his stupid harmonica. (8) I would play at home and not dishonor myself or my daughter! (9) Often straying, he sighed thinly, like a woman, and a guilty smile appeared on his round face. (10) I was ready to sink through the ground with shame and behaved emphatically coldly, showing with my appearance that this ridiculous man with a red nose had nothing to do with me.

(11) I was in the third grade when I had a bad cold. (12) I have otitis media. (13) In pain, I screamed and pounded my head with my palms. (14) Mom called an ambulance, and at night we went to the district hospital. (15) On the way we got into a terrible snowstorm, the car got stuck, and the driver shrillly, like a woman, began to shout that now we will all freeze. (16) He screamed piercingly, almost cried, and I thought that his ears also hurt. (17) The father asked how much was left to the regional center. (18) But the driver, covering his face with his hands, repeated: “What a fool I am!” (19) The father thought and quietly said to his mother: “We will need all the courage!” (20) I remembered these words for the rest of my life, although wild pain circled me like a snowflake blizzard. (21) He opened the car door and went out into the roaring night. (22) The door slammed behind him, and it seemed to me that a huge monster, with a clanging jaw, swallowed my father. (23) The car was rocked by gusts of wind, snow was falling on the frosty windows with a rustle. (24) I cried, my mother kissed me with cold lips, the young nurse looked doomed into the impenetrable darkness, and the driver shook his head in exhaustion.

(25) I don’t know how much time has passed, but suddenly the night was lit up with bright headlights, and a long shadow of some giant fell on my face. (26) I closed my eyes and through my eyelashes I saw my father. (27) He took me in his arms and pressed me to him. (28) In a whisper, he told his mother that he had reached the regional center, raised everyone to their feet and returned with an all-terrain vehicle.

(29) I dozed in his arms and through my sleep I heard him coughing. (30) Then no one attached any importance to this. (31) And for a long time later he was ill with bilateral pneumonia.

(32) ... My children are perplexed why, when decorating a Christmas tree, I always cry. (ZZ) From the darkness of the past, a father comes to me, he sits under the tree and puts his head on the button accordion, as if he stealthily wants to see his daughter among the dressed up crowd of children and smile at her cheerfully. (34) I look at his face shining with happiness and also want to smile at him, but instead I start to cry.

(According to N. Aksyonova)

Read a fragment of a review based on the text that you analyzed while completing tasks A29 - A31, B1 - B7.

This fragment examines the language features of the text. Some terms used in the review are missing. Fill in the gaps with the numbers corresponding to the number of the term from the list. If you do not know which number from the list should be in place of the gap, write the number 0.

The sequence of numbers in the order in which you wrote them down in the text of the review at the place of the gaps, write down in the answer sheet No. 1 to the right of the task number B8, starting from the first cell.

“The use by the narrator to describe the blizzard of such a lexical means of expression as _____ ("terrible blizzard", "impenetrable darkness"), gives expressive power to the depicted picture, and such paths as _____ ("pain circled me" in sentence 20) and _____ ("the driver began to scream shrillly, like a woman" in sentence 15), convey the drama of the situation described in the text . A technique such as _____ (in sentence 34) enhances the emotional impact on the reader.

Similar posts